Dis said:
Okay. And you're right.
They DO work together. Whether or not they work well together is a different question.
No seriously... they don't.
What makes you think so?
That thing about F motivating T?
T helping plan a surprise party because F wants it to happen?
That one doesn't fly -- Not as an absolute.
Both of those examples might take place, but they don't have to.
T makes a decision to do something, T will make sure it gets done. It doesn't need to be lifted up. It's a decision.
You can have made a decision by T and still go through with it even if your Feeling tells you not to, or even if you'd never really known how the Feel about it.
I know, 'cause I've done it.
It's usually called being stubborn, but that's a bunch of shit.
That is definitively incorrect.
All motive to do something is based on some underlying concept of a desire for something good over something bad. In this case, good and bad can be meant in a very visceral sense, as well as a lofty moral sense. These feelings of good and bad, and these desires and aversions, are aspects of Feeling. Like how Jung said that Thinking determines what something is, Feelings determines whether or not it is agreable.
Now, since anything we do is motivated by these Feeling related aspect, then every person's actions actually involve a collaboration of Thinking and Feeling. When he is describing what some call stubborness, Nocapszy is incorrectly labeling a clash of two seperate Feeling values as a clash between Thinking and Feeling.
The Poriferan doesn't know enough about typology to know whether what he's saying is true or even plausible.
Thinking is not married to, nor is it the opposition of Feeling. Thinking is not simply a true or false metric.
Ask Jennifer. She knows this shit better than you or I.
Especially The Poriferan.
Or better yet -- read a damned book.
My recommendation is Lenore Thompson.
My energy will not be further wasted on The Poriferan's posts concerning the subject of typology.
The Poriferan doesn't know enough about typology to know whether what he's saying is true or even plausible.
Thinking is not married to, nor is it the opposition of Feeling. Thinking is not simply a true or false metric.
Ask Jennifer. She knows this shit better than you or I.
Especially you.
Some defining and validating of terms is what this requires.
My energy will not be further wasted on The Poriferan's posts concerning the subject of typology.
If he lives up to this claim, I can finally correct his bullshit without him getting in the way.
Have a breathmint... ugh...