i stopped reading lolAlso, the 'order' of functions is fluid, and depends on the person. The shorthand for the functions to work with are in the MBTI type codes that you already have.
EDIT:
now that i went on a rant i ask a question: what is the real world application of this? does it bring anything "new" to the current MBTI system or is it just a different way of looking at it? and i apologize for the rant.
The idea is that just having the profiles is not good enough because people don't really 'fit' them. The idea is that yes, there are variations on type, and an attempt to explain some of them as a part of certain patterns. This is an educated guess as to what the patterns might be.
The question remains, do you think it is possible at all ?!
Is it possible at all to make a masterplan of every personality
It is possible... but it'll take far too long. It's best to understand the principle of deriving personality of an individual and do it case by case.
And there our opinions differ from each other. I think you do not account randomnity into your system and that is something that is a mighty weapon.
For example: what do we do with people who are insane in the membrane ? Say we cant sort them into the system, because we didnt know how they were, when they were sane. Do we count them as mavericks ?
I don't understand what you're trying to get at here. It is precisely because I value people as individuals that I think they shouldn't be boxed into one of 16 types. What are the crucial points that I'm missing? Please enlighten.The beautiful and most important thing in human life is to value life. If you start calculating it into a system, you are going to miss cruxial points. Or you are not going to miss crucial points, it depends on the variety of your perceptive-ableness.
I dont know, I dont think that you are missing anything at all. I am convinced that your approach is right.
It's just I read your things and it doesnt feel right. Guess that's a thing I have to figure out for myself.
But you are not doing anything wrong in no way. Dynamic type can be true. I wont rule that out.
And excuse me for not talking to you, but I do not have the strength at the moment.
Thanks . I guess my problem is, I lack understanding of any sort of pyschology things in the first place. I have my way to see things and MBTI is a tool to help me describe my view. It sometimes works. But if you start changing MBTI now for the better, I loose the first tool I EVER found to describe my things.
Guess the best thing is to finally develop a system of my own that can be told to other people. It's just, that's boring, I am an engineer not a psychatrist.
So if you read my posts, criticize them, smile on them but NEVER take em seriously . I just lack the expertise to be taken seriously