Ok guys, I didn't think it will shock you so much
I thought about NF because of his approach to his leadership and his goals, or in his case, it's better to say quest.
You know, he was not a cruel conqueror like e.g. Napoleon, whose goal was only to unite a whole countries under his absolute power. I've heard that Alexander have had an ideal of connecting the world into one nation. He seemed much less to crave an absolute power over people, he wanted the people to be happy and united at the end, though he apparently were doing it by means of war. Also he seemed to have a little interest in mundane trumpery. This includes physical pleasures as well. He was not very fond of sexual orgies and all that kind of crap which such a great leader usually enjoyed to full extent...
. And Napoleon did a lot of good things, despite cutting off a few well-deserving noble heads.
Then he made himself an emperor, so what was the point?
Prof. Stetson concludes, "Any difference in French and American family law in the nineteenth century seemed insignificant to the women under their sway. Whether ruled by common-law coverture or the code of Napoleon, society offered women few alternatives to marriage and marriage destroyed all legal economic independence for women."
The wife was excluded from inheriting any portion of the family property, it being assumed that the husband would make separate arrangements for the maintenance of his spouse.
it's getting easier and easier to "type" famous people on this board.
Whatever gains women made in the original phases of the French Revolution were wiped out by Napoleon's civil code of 1804, it merely reinforced husband's and father's rights over women.
Many states in the USA at this same time allowed a woman to sue for divorce if her husband committed adultery, not so in Napoleon's France, though a husband could have his wife imprisoned for between 3 months and 2 years for her adultery.
You know, he was not a cruel conqueror like e.g. Napoleon, whose goal was only to unite a whole countries under his absolute power. I've heard that Alexander have had an ideal of connecting the world into one nation. He seemed much less to crave an absolute power over people, he wanted the people to be happy and united at the end, though he apparently were doing it by means of war. Also he seemed to have a little interest in mundane trumpery. This includes physical pleasures as well. He was not very fond of sexual orgies and all that kind of crap which such a great leader usually enjoyed to full extent...
Alex - ENTJ with morals. I know it's unheard of, but a motivated leader and strategist who sought to spread his Greco-Macedonian culture around the known world (and gain power for himself, of course) It's just like the age old, 'Was Napoleon the Heir to the Revolution' question.