S
Society
Guest
Maybe ita because as long as we dont express them you ar free to imagin what they are. alternatively, as long as we need to figure them out you can have your say in how they get interpreted.
Admittedly, it does engage my Fe, in that respect. It gets too exhausting with fellow F's, though.
I think for T on T connections emotions are glossed over 4 times out of 5. Ive heard one person usually takes on the more F role eventually. Obviously not as effectively as someone with a natural feeling preference, but you learn. It gives you a perspective on the things that Fs find so attractive about us. Seeking out those hidden squishy bits, etc. I think that natural tendency to want to complement your partner keeps you from the incestuous feeling. Do you find that not to occur in F/F pairings?
Very much so. Just lack of balance, entirely. No eh, 'spark,' for lack of a better word.
xNFx: cliff
(sorry, you all have to die)
Too candy sweet, for me, usually. Too much mush, not enough edginess
Maybe ita because as long as we dont express them you ar free to imagin what they are. alternatively, as long as we need to figure them out you can have your say in how they get interpreted.
Fuck em all
Cliff: lexicon
Updated version, following the rules this time:marry: INFJ
wildcard: INFP
screw first, throw off a cliff later: ENFP, ENFJ
Fwiw, if only the Typoc ones counted, my choices would be totally different.Your loss
And NTs seem all too willing to come to NFs to have their wounds cleaned and licked for them
This can't be true...
This can't be true...
Marry: Nobody
Fuck/Partner: XNFP
Wildcard/Cliff (stabbed first, then threw body off): XNFJ