Mal12345
Permabanned
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2011
- Messages
- 14,532
- MBTI Type
- IxTP
- Enneagram
- 5w4
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/sp
You said ISTJ and ISFP share Se. That must have been a mistake on your part, then. Because I know why an ISTJ can look like an ISFP...Si/Fi loop with very high Fi, and looking less INFP even though they have Ne instead of Se, simply through the fact they're Si dom...which is what I already said many posts back.
Jung was an ISTP and based his theories on actual observations of patients. He at least began with reality.
Maybe the entire thing I wrote is mistaken, but I see some level of agreement at the start of this thread. The agreement doesn't relate to THEORY per se, but only to some people's actual experiences with the types. And I am partially working from experience to extrapolate the rest of the type tertiaries. That assumes (yes, I assume things too) the possibility of creating one theory to describe all types. But I don't mistake my own assumptions as factual.
I argued against the absurd idea that Jung was on ISTP back on PersN. I don't base my INTJ call on Jung's self-description as being a factually oriented person. If he really was fact-oriented, then *he should have produced the facts*. But all he produced was theory.