Could it be that fictional NT characters are just consistently mistyped? It's almost as if NT characters only get an NT typing if they have a glaring flaw that indicates low feeling/low sensing. Granted the NT stereotype is the least superficially likeable, with ENTPs getting the biggest pass here because they are somehow more tolerable, people are quick to avoid putting protagonists in the NT box. I'd argue that this is also the case for SJ characters, except replace "likeable" with "interesting".
Yes.
I would bet that a lot of NT characters get S-ified just for the sake of showing action and conflict.
Easy, most writers aren't NT themselves, thefore they are unable or uninterested in having their characters mimic the NT ways of going about life.
If you take a screenwriting class (Hollywood-style, anyway), a lot of emphasis is placed on showing conflict, both external and internal. "No conflict, no story," as they say. Showing a lot of Se and Fe/Te serves that objective. But a lot of French movies show more Ji than Je, and there are some Iranian movies that are more like that as well. It's a subtler style. Obviously, some US movies do that too, but the main style seems more E.
There is no way for everyone's opinions on type to be consistent enough to know the real typologoical percententages , much less in the fictional realm. No offense, but the methods of determining thevrarury if types are flawed. I mean who thinks phone serveys are reliable?
Good point. I'm not so sure about the thevrarury. I generally go by (1) who they remind me of the most, especially if they remind me of multiple people, then (2) functions and stuff, and then (3) I second guess myself until I'm tired of it. That's my rubric. "Thevrarury" is an apt word for it.
I think NT characters can be cool of the writer is good, but the in their head thing like someone else here said could make them boring if not done well.
The dude in Pi (1998, Darren Aronofsky) was extremely in his head. The movie did a great job of telling the story, in spite of that. That guy had schizophrenia, though. Not your average NT, whether he was an NT or not.
I wonder if the percentage of NT main characters in books is higher than the percentage in film/tv. Probably easier to show in a book.
a genre dependent or niche type character
I am not a niche-type character! And neither is my evil fictional movie twin.
Yeah, NT's definitely don't claim sovereignty over critical thinking and logical analysis.
We really don't even claim consistency at it.

Unless some of us are fibbing.....
I think a lot of (maybe even most, it's too hard to say) scientist/engineer types are ST. The scientific POV benefits greatly from strong S data paired with T judgment.
Agreed
I sometimes find certain fields of science a bit too sensate and practical to interest me much. I feel like a bit of an intellectual hippy-mystic, compared to my ST friends.
Likewise. Science is mystifying and romantic, until it gets too repetitious.

:bookish:

In action films it makes sense to have strong Se dominant or aux characters. That would be the main issue for main characters not being NT (or NF for that matter), if you have a high physical action show it does imply Sensor prowess.
Yeah. Also, I think, Ji. That might be why some people are saying that NFs aren't often main characters or are the victim, or whatever--those are more likely INFs, and there might not be a lot of ISF main characters either... Easier to show Fe/Te than Fi/Ti if you're showing conflict, dialogue, and action.
Actually, Ni might be more common than Ji, as well. But that's when a Cassandra-like archetype is used. I don't know if it's used for a lot of other characters, but it's certainly used for that.