Tellenbach
in dreamland
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2013
- Messages
- 6,086
- MBTI Type
- ISTJ
- Enneagram
- 6w5
Parkhomov Breakthrough
Is anyone else following this story? I first became interested in cold fusion in 1997 when I heard Art Bell's interview with science writer, Eugene Mallove. Dr. Mallove was telling the radio audience about a Good Morning America segment on James Patterson's power cell. Patterson's company, CETI, had developed a water heater that used cold fusion technology. Unfortunately, Patterson was never able to get consistent results. He had one good batch of beads but couldn't figure out how to manufacture them consistently.
Here's the transcript of the part that most interested me: (MG is Michael Guillen, the science editor for Good Morning America; JP is James Patterson, the inventor of the Patterson power cell)
Transcript of ABC-TV "Good Morning America"
I saw the Good Morning America segment and it showed a time-lapse shot of the geiger counter with the needle on the gauge going down significantly. Fast forward 18 years: Dr. Patterson has died and he was never able to get consistent beads that worked.
Now, cold fusion is back and multiple groups have reported positive results, but I don't think any of these results are published in peer review journals. That's a problem.
Is anyone else following this story? I first became interested in cold fusion in 1997 when I heard Art Bell's interview with science writer, Eugene Mallove. Dr. Mallove was telling the radio audience about a Good Morning America segment on James Patterson's power cell. Patterson's company, CETI, had developed a water heater that used cold fusion technology. Unfortunately, Patterson was never able to get consistent results. He had one good batch of beads but couldn't figure out how to manufacture them consistently.
Here's the transcript of the part that most interested me: (MG is Michael Guillen, the science editor for Good Morning America; JP is James Patterson, the inventor of the Patterson power cell)
MG (voiceover): During the last year, Patterson's little beads have led to a huge surprise. Not only do they produce heat. It turns out, they also neutralize radioactivity.
JP: This is the cell system down here . . .
MG: It sounds like such an amazing development, the company is attracting big name scientists, like Norm Olsen. He traveled all the way from Hanford, Washington, where the government stores billions of gallons of high level radioactive waste.
Norman Olsen: If this technology works out as advertised, it means we could significantly reduce the radioactivity of nuclear waste in the United States, and the world.
MG: But does it work as advertised? We decided to put it to the test.
JP: What I have in this cup is radioactive uranium in a water medium.
MG: And that's what's sending that Geiger going crazy, right?
JP: Yes.
MG: So the idea is that the radioactive material will then flow through your device, and actually remove the radioactivity?
JP: Yes.
MG: I don't believe it. Go ahead and push the button. Let's see if it works.(Laughs.)
MG (voiceover during time lapse shot): The experiment began at high noon, with the Geiger counter registering well over 300. But by speeding up the video, you can see that after a couple of hours, the radioactivity was cut down by more than half— a reduction that would take billions of years to happen naturally.
Transcript of ABC-TV "Good Morning America"
I saw the Good Morning America segment and it showed a time-lapse shot of the geiger counter with the needle on the gauge going down significantly. Fast forward 18 years: Dr. Patterson has died and he was never able to get consistent beads that worked.
Now, cold fusion is back and multiple groups have reported positive results, but I don't think any of these results are published in peer review journals. That's a problem.