Totenkindly
@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 52,168
- MBTI Type
- BELF
- Enneagram
- 594
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/sp
AA and rehab culture have shockingly low success rates, and made it impossible to have real debate about addiction
Alcoholics Anonymous is a part of our nation’s fabric. In the seventy-six years since AA was created, 12-step programs have expanded to include over three hundred different organizations, focusing on such diverse issues as smoking, shoplifting, social phobia, debt, recovery from incest, even vulgarity. All told, more than five million people recite the Serenity Prayer at meetings across the United States every year.
Twelve-step programs hold a privileged place in our culture as well. The legions of “anonymous†members who comprise these groups are helped in their proselytizing mission by TV shows such as “Intervention†(now canceled), which preaches the gospel of recovery. “Going to rehab†is likewise a common refrain in music and film, where it is almost always uncritically presented as the one true hope for beating addiction. AA and rehab have even been codified into our legal system: court-mandated attendance, which began in the late 1980s, is today a staple of drug-crime policy. Every year, our state and federal governments spend over $15 billion on substance-abuse treatment for addicts, the vast majority of which are based on 12-step programs. There is only one problem: these programs almost always fail.
Peer-reviewed studies peg the success rate of AA somewhere between 5 and 10 percent. That is, about one of every fifteen people who enter these programs is able to become and stay sober. In 2006, one of the most prestigious scientific research organizations in the world, the Cochrane Collaboration, conducted a review of the many studies conducted between 1966 and 2005 and reached a stunning conclusion: “No experimental studies unequivocally demonstrated the effectiveness of AA†in treating alcoholism. This group reached the same conclusion about professional AA-oriented treatment (12-step facilitation therapy, or TSF), which is the core of virtually every alcoholism-rehabilitation program in the country.
Many people greet this finding with open hostility. After all, walk down any street in any city and you are likely to run into a dozen people who swear by AA—either from personal experience or because they know someone whose life was saved by the program. Even people who have no experience with AA may still have heard that it works or protest that 5 to 10 percent is a significant number when we’re talking about millions of people. So AA isn’t perfect, runs this thread of reasoning. Have you got anything better?....
article continued here:
The pseudo-science of Alcoholics Anonymous: There’s a better way to treat addiction - Salon.com
My personal experience with AA comes through my father's chronic alcoholism, along with his two brothers. All three grew up to be chronic drinkers, and two of them died from the long-term effects of alcohol, as well as suffering (and projecting on family) all the misery that goes along with it. Interestingly, the third brother went to AA and has been sober for a few decades now... although he has also been the most difficult of the three personality-wise for people to interact with.
Despite multiple DUIs, job losses, and a 30-day jail stint, my dad refused to accept that he had an alcohol issue until he almost died in 2005 from alcohol-related causes (he was comatose for two days) and had to attend weekly AA meetings as well as months of physical therapy to recover. He only attended for 7-9 months (and that period of his life was striking in his productivity, as he was actually sober), but then he decided that he didn't have an alcohol problem and the AA folks were all despicable holier-than-thou jerks, so he spent the last 7-8 years of his life back in a drunken stupor until his body finally gave out. [official cause of death: Chronic effects of alcohol poisoning. Shocking.]
My ex-aunt (who eventually divorced the uncle some years before he died of alcohol-related causes) was herself kind of the "librarian teetotaler religious zealot" type and proselytized me for Al-Anon back when I was in college -- and although I'm pretty easy-going, and although I totally acknowledged that my dad had a drinking problem that had created a lot of suffering in our family (issues I wanted to resolve with him), I remember being so pissed off as how obnoxious she was about it... there was a lot of condescension when she would talk about my dad and my uncle, even if I was frustrated with their unwavering addiction to the bottle.
So what's described in the article seems to generally follow my prior thoughts -- I think the program can be effective for certain types of people and not effective for others, and that it's not the only way one can work through the problems. I can see how gaining an awareness of the underlying psychology could be helpful for some (including myself).
(Addiction is horrendous to claw your way out of regardless, honestly. I think my dad's issue was two-fold, at least -- AA wasn't the kind of program that was effective for him, it wasn't flexible enough; and he also had too much pride/self-insecurity to admit he had a problem that had destroyed his family, career, and generally his life.)
Thoughts?
Experiences?
(On even just 12-step style programs in general?)