Totenkindly
@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 52,149
- MBTI Type
- BELF
- Enneagram
- 594
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/sp
I find myself frustrated by stupid articles online, since I happen to frequent a lot of fan/genre sites especially for comics and film. Comics cross-sectioned with comic book films (like the MCU film series) tend to be the worst... basically speculation posts that have barely any content worth reading.
Here is a typical example, although I have run across worse.
wegotthiscovered.com
This article is really pointless. If you are reading it, you have probably seen the film(s) in question and know the Sorcerer Supreme held the Time stone, so duh they can see the future. And there is no further content -- to note, "Since Frigga was raised by witches, chances are that..." Note how the article offers no actual content! It's supposed to be explaining how Frigga knew heavy Thor was a future self, and all it has to offer is "Frigga was a witch, so she could probably see the future in some way..." Like, duh. You don't need to read the article to just make the same stupid guess yourself, since witches since Macbeth have foretold the future. Is there any unique specific content being offered here? No.
The article then concludes with that infamous, "Do you disagree? If so, post below!"
These are just glorified pages to get more traffic for their site by getting readers to post in the Comments + to run random ads and justify charging more for advertising. And there are so many of them that way, including Screenrant or whatever else. I think only about 30% of the fan-genre articles I end up looking at actually have something worthwhile to say about the topic in question nowadays. It didn't quite used to be this way, but it's all become fluff pieces along the way.
Here is a typical example, although I have run across worse.

How Thor's Mother Knew He Was From The Future In Avengers: Endgame
None of the Marvel Cinematic Universe's marquee characters have gone through anywhere near as much trauma as Chris Hemsworth's Thor. Not only has he lost both of his parents and seen his brother die more than once, but his entire homeworld and half of its population were wiped out right in front...

As revealed in Doctor Strange, sorcerers are able to look into the future as the Ancient One (Tilda Swinton) did. This is the reason why she knew that Stephen Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) is destined to be the best Sorcerer Supreme as early as 2012, years before the neurosurgeon’s accident. This ability was in full display in Infinity War when Doctor Strange looked into what lies ahead with their impending fight against Thanos. Since Frigga was raised by witches as she told Thor, chances are that she knew that they have this specific ability, leading to the belief that that time traveling is also entirely possible. In addition, this could explain why Loki (Tom Hiddleston) was also aware of this as he mentioned in Thor: Ragnarok; he always had a closer relationship with his adoptive mother and it’s possible that he learned about the idea from Frigga.
This article is really pointless. If you are reading it, you have probably seen the film(s) in question and know the Sorcerer Supreme held the Time stone, so duh they can see the future. And there is no further content -- to note, "Since Frigga was raised by witches, chances are that..." Note how the article offers no actual content! It's supposed to be explaining how Frigga knew heavy Thor was a future self, and all it has to offer is "Frigga was a witch, so she could probably see the future in some way..." Like, duh. You don't need to read the article to just make the same stupid guess yourself, since witches since Macbeth have foretold the future. Is there any unique specific content being offered here? No.
The article then concludes with that infamous, "Do you disagree? If so, post below!"
These are just glorified pages to get more traffic for their site by getting readers to post in the Comments + to run random ads and justify charging more for advertising. And there are so many of them that way, including Screenrant or whatever else. I think only about 30% of the fan-genre articles I end up looking at actually have something worthwhile to say about the topic in question nowadays. It didn't quite used to be this way, but it's all become fluff pieces along the way.