LightSun
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2009
- Messages
- 1,180
- MBTI Type
- INFP
- Enneagram
- #9
“Reactive / Proactive: In order for changes to be implemented we need to develop a proactive stand versus reactive? Why is if we have to propel our self into action only when danger manifests rather than anticipating it and only thereupon making effective change upon the planet? State what is reactive and what is proactive and what is the difference? Which do we happen to be? Taking this view what will be the long-range repercussions? How can we change this? Is it possible that biological predisposition is redirected?â€
"We are reactive species and not proactive. We are propelled to act only in crises. In order for changes to be implemented we need to develop a proactive stand vs. reactive. Why is it we have to wait to receive danger rather than anticipating it? Thus we could make effective change upon the planet in proactive fashion with an toward the future? We have this reactive element and resist change, mostly fear of the unknown and people fortune tell, "perhaps I will be the worse for the changes. We need specialists we can trust to help usher in new changes that we may not be comfortable with due to lack of familiarity. I intend to vote for politicians who espouse humanitarian ideals.
Such as education, increasing the happiness quota ratio, children, environment and closing the wealth gap in America. It is only by being cognizant and electing officials who espouse these ideals can we get a toe hold in Washington to confront the lobbyists who dampen our attempts to make real change. Our minds in generality are geared toward today with some immediate pleasure vs. planning for contingencies that may happen or not. Otherwise we of course should be ruled by and large by reason. We seek a thrill, or pleasure and damn consequences. We would not ruin the environment if we were so proactive and we certainly would give more attention to children, & education."
"We are reactive species and not proactive. We are propelled to act only in crises. In order for changes to be implemented we need to develop a proactive stand vs. reactive. Why is it we have to wait to receive danger rather than anticipating it? Thus we could make effective change upon the planet in proactive fashion with an toward the future? We have this reactive element and resist change, mostly fear of the unknown and people fortune tell, "perhaps I will be the worse for the changes. We need specialists we can trust to help usher in new changes that we may not be comfortable with due to lack of familiarity. I intend to vote for politicians who espouse humanitarian ideals.
Such as education, increasing the happiness quota ratio, children, environment and closing the wealth gap in America. It is only by being cognizant and electing officials who espouse these ideals can we get a toe hold in Washington to confront the lobbyists who dampen our attempts to make real change. Our minds in generality are geared toward today with some immediate pleasure vs. planning for contingencies that may happen or not. Otherwise we of course should be ruled by and large by reason. We seek a thrill, or pleasure and damn consequences. We would not ruin the environment if we were so proactive and we certainly would give more attention to children, & education."