Showrunner: we're stuck making another season, although I hoped to get a deal with Netflix on original properties. Any ideas after nothing was left from Season 1?
Writer 1: We don't have any ideas.
Writer 2: Well, when that is the case, why not make a season involving the Borg again? Everyone loves the Borg!
Writer 3: yeah, YEAH -- and we're introduce Q again too! Everyone loves Q!
Showrunner: Wow, what a great idea -- and the network knows those properties, so they will be happy with us! make it so!
Aside from retreading the same old villains, another thing that bothered me (and this is kind of nitpicky), was how trite and lazy some of the dialogue was. Picard referred to an entirely new class of ship as a "refit". I know it's a minor point, but in pretty much every previous trek (and in real world usage, for that matter), the term refit has always referred to a preexisting craft/ship/vehicle that has been upgraded, modified, and/or rehauled to bring the specs up to current technology. The Stargazer we saw in the PIC season 2 was almost certainly a new ship/class and not a refit of an older class or vessel. The design is obviously inspired by an older design, but that doesn't make it a refit. The writers can't even be bothered to maintain any sense of consistency with pre-established rules (in this case a rule that has its basis in the real world). I know it's niticky as hell of me, but I think this sort of thing is important in maintaining believability and coherency. I'd expect this sort of lazy oversight in a fan film production, maybe, but in a high budget series that is the official continuation of TNG with writers who are supposedly touted as highly talented and among the best, it's unforgivable. They need some sort of universe bible or a consultant like the Okudas checking their scripts before this shit goes to production. It's fucking drivel and feels like they don't even care as long as they can drop some member berries and rack up the views.Based on conversations I've had, I decided to give Picard S2 (and S3) a chance. I have watched about 1.5 episodes in Season 2.
To get my initial gripe off my chest, here's how I envision the writing room:
So yeah, episode 1 -- the freakin' borg + even Q again.Because we can't do new stuff, and keep falling back on the same ol' things that people like.
... However, I must admit it's already stronger than Season 1:
So I will keep watching. It could actually end up being better overall than Season. I really don't get why reviewers liked Season 1 -- it was just ... kinda bad TV aside from maybe one scene each episode (and the Troi/Riker episode was okay). It really felt like they didn't know what they wanted to do during Season 1 except say goodbye to Data. I think some of the TV reviewers RT scores are just untrustworthy for franchise shows because they are invested in the franchise; I tend to trust RT TV reviewers more for indie shows without a franchise involved, those tend to be more "independent" reviewers who just evaluate a show against all other shows out there, and they're falling back on core storytelling and features rather than franchise world consistency and nostalgia.
- The writing of the first episode is actually tighter and better quality (rather than generic fluff).
- It's better directed.
- A few of the action sequences actually had momentum to them and felt dangerous.
- It looks like they are revising Agnes (Alison Pill's character) to actually fall back on her strengths as an actress (I wonder if she had input to the character?) and avoid the milquetoast grinning idiot doctor she played in S1, because she's sassier, snappier, and more sardonic out of the box.
- In general, they seem to have reset to a grittier show versus some kind of shallower version of "This is Us [in Space!]" like they ended up, having people go back to their more realistic pathways for their lives.
If it were a great, original story, I'd overlook shit like that. But I only notice it more when everything else is so lazy and overdone. It's like the cherry on top of a shit sundae. There's plenty of past inconsistencies and dumb shit I overlooked because the overall shows or episodes might still be solid. I could overlook a DS9 episode contradicting some canon detail because the episode writing tended to be so strong and I was so involved in the story to not really mind. It's easier to notice when the story is boring and not keeping me engaged, because at that point all that's left to be wowed by are the visuals and non-crucial lore. If they can't even get those right, there's nothing left worth watching lolI guess they are writing for idiots like me who would never even recognize that kinds of things you have noticed -- I just am not that well acquainted with the details.
I guess personally, I would rather have them screw up the word "re-fit" and tell an actually good story that moves me in some way and that I will want to rewatch in the future, versus getting the word correct but writing shitty episodes that leave me wanting to bail after three episodes.
how far did you get in season 1 and/or how many spoilers did you read about the season?I finished voyager, I dont remember it ending so abruptly; but i was a kid and there was a lot going on at home. So I didnt always get to see what happened and i was checked out a lot. It was like ripping a bandaid off. would have been nice to get a few episodes of everyone back home but its like whatever. Im watching dicovery now that theres four seasons, and I like it pretty well so far. I like what they're doing with Lorca, though I wish they'd done it a little differently, I keep hoping for a mirror universe redemption arc, and i think any other time but 2018 we'd have gotten that. As it stands, my biggest gripe is is feels in a liminal space between classic startrek and the future, everything looks too futuristic. Dont get me wrong its pretty and it works, but i feel like this show would do better in the future. Jason Isaacs is doing what he does best, and I enjoy the hell out of the character, just wish we got that mirror universe happy ending like in ds9 i was also hoping we got seven seasons of enterprise but it wasnt in the cards either. But all that aside its pretty good so far, I like the crew, I like the spore drive, and I like the light sensetivity its relatable. Im pretty sure we''re living in that mirror universe, we're definitly the terrans theyr e talking about iny way they just got back to the mirror universe but ive loved the little details tht they show for the audience to figutre it out before the crew., fun show, hope they get seven
Indeed, entierly too jam packed and rushed. (I wanted at least 3 seasons with this Lorca plot and I maintain that I want an extended show set in the mirror universe.) They just got to the mirror universe. I've been enjoying the heck out of Lorca; the writers have done a great job dropping clues, I have enjoyed how he "inspires" the crew to push past their limits unselfishly. If Stammits hadnt folded with "Just one more jump" I don't think Lorca would have rushed his plans.how far did you get in season 1 and/or how many spoilers did you read about the season?
It's a season that is laden with twists, and I wish they had treated them more carefully as well (they have some great puzzles but expose the answers FAR too quickly).
I really liked Lorca through much of the season.
I never finished Voyager. I think I watched 1.5 - 2 seasons when it was airing, then got bored with it.
Yeah, the major twists of the season would have been so much better if they could have been extended a few seasons -- basically really setting you up to believe one thing about the characters involved, and then waiting for a really opportune moment to spring the twist or even just playing with it... you know, like the characters find out about the twist but it seems false and they deny it, leaving you in a "are they or aren't they?" position and maybe even convincing you the twist is false, thus REALLY blowing your mind later.Indeed, entierly too jam packed and rushed. (I wanted at least 3 seasons with this Lorca plot and I maintain that I want an extended show set in the mirror universe.) They just got to the mirror universe. I've been enjoying the heck out of Lorca; the writers have done a great job dropping clues, I have enjoyed how he "inspires" the crew to push past their limits unselfishly. If Stammits hadnt folded with "Just one more jump" I don't think Lorca would have rushed his plans.
Ive managed to stay away from spoilers, ironically easy since most reviews Ive stumpled upon are just "anti woke" bullshit which is pretty debunked just by watching the show. Lorca isnt a villain because he's a "white cis het guy" he's a villain because ultimately it seems like he's doing villainous things. (It really does seem we live in the mirror universe...yikes) Im betting Lorca is so protective of Michael, because whomever the emperor is(I'm betting its gonna be Mirror Georgiou) probably has at least a Mirror Kira affinity for her. I'm afraid Lorca is going to not be with us much longer which sucks. We need more complex characters in fiction, I just wish we lived in the non mirror universe, where morally complex characters get to live a redemption arc instead of a doom of damocles of their own hubris.
Tilly takes some flack from your white fanboy audience -- she scans as a very young ESFJ or something like that, which is the antithesis of what they want in their shows. I found her both annoying at times and yet totally refreshing -- I'm really glad they included her, because I had not seen a character like her before, really, that a Trek show actually spends time on. I think she's very relatable and ends up being extremely important to the crew's successes.Voyager is really good series, that could have been one of the best if they hadnt insisted on the sitcom reset at the end of every episode minus the occasional two parter. It really suffered not being able to have more solid arcs like in Ds9 (Im loving the discovery arcs so far) The cast of Voyager might be among my favorite for just sheer amount of likable/relatable characters and any show that brings back Reg Barclay is good for me. Though I gotta say Tilly in Discovery is VERY relatable, but tbf a lot of them are. The PTSD depiction is good imo too, it matches a lot of my own symptoms...It's nice we finally get some openly queer characters instead of just being coded or having to stay in the closet. And I love Doug Jones in anything. To Boldly go with Abe Sapien. what a dream.
Yeah, the major twists of the season would have been so much better if they could have been extended a few seasons -- basically really setting you up to believe one thing about the characters involved, and then waiting for a really opportune moment to spring the twist or even just playing with it... you know, like the characters find out about the twist but it seems false and they deny it, leaving you in a "are they or aren't they?" position and maybe even convincing you the twist is false, thus REALLY blowing your mind later.
There are two things about it -- Brian Fuller (showrunner) left during the first season, and so then there seems to be a lot of "course correction" that occurred in mid/late season as they try to put things back to the show I guess the network wanted... and also as you note, if the series tanked, I guess they wanted to get everything in before the end. But that sucks too. You can't have these great payoffs when networks are just running things based on dollars. They all want hit shows out of the can, but sometimes you have to do the slow build. Maybe it would help if shows actually had defined endings?
(Like, I think Dark always planned on three seasons, and each season makes sense, and the series would have sucked if they had canned it early. The last season is kind of mind-blowing in how it expands and reconfigures the two that came before.)
It kinda felt like they didn't know how to complete Fuller's vision, so they just fumbled around and tried to get rid of everything to do a more conventional Trek show.
Doug Jones is great in whatever he does. Saru is wonderfully shaped and made, and Jones brings him to life. Totally feels like a real, alien person -- yet I can strongly understand to him and relate to him.
Yeah, it was sad that Lorca essentially gets written off as what he because he IS what he is. LIke, they should have regular Starfleet captains who embody his pragmatism and encouragement -- he always pushed his crew and actually was quite someone who could be followed, even if he wasn't entirely orthodox. (For what it's worth, I'm feeling like Picard S2 and S3 are at least willing to make more complex "good guys" -- maybe they are learning something?) Isaacs did such a great job with that role, I feel like he's typically been underrated in much of his work -- which is extensive. He was in this cool series that never really got off the ground called "Awake," I wish it had been better known at the time and it only lasted a season despite his great acting and supporting cast.
Discovery S2 brings in Ansel Mount, which maybe proves they aren't out to get the cis het white guy. I thought it was gonna be a dud; Mount ends up being freaking excellent, and playing a more by the book captain. I was surprised at how much I enjoyed him, and it taps into well-known Trek history in very poignant ways, I know they've been following up on it in Strange New Worlds.
Tilly takes some flack from your white fanboy audience -- she scans as a very young ESFJ or something like that, which is the antithesis of what they want in their shows. I found her both annoying at times and yet totally refreshing -- I'm really glad they included her, because I had not seen a character like her before, really, that a Trek show actually spends time on. I think she's very relatable and ends up being extremely important to the crew's successes.
And yeah, they didn't dabble in queer characters, they actually went full-in -- not just with Stamets and Culber, but also with Gray and Adira. This series has been all over the place, and I hate representation as a political stance, but I appreciate how they actually dove into these characters and made them real people. The writing gets better as it goes.
It hasnt seemed that way to me. It seems pretty much like other trek just without pussyfooting around coding characters as something and just giving the representation. I havent noticed anyone being snarky or mean spirited, just scared, it doesnt seem like its trying to be edgy or preachy, or insisting upon itself. As far as the grimdark goes, its hard to find anything in our current grim dark setting that doesnt reflect that aspect of reality, but that's been happening to entertainment since the spring line up of 2002. But the main cast doesnt seem cardboard to me either. The flash of space battles is there, but there is very much interesting ethical quanderies; in fact ive enjoyed the realism of a big war calling those enlightened sensibilities that everyone fosters during peace time which are often the first things to go when combat comes; its been nice seeing some conflict in the systems morality because imo it makes it more impactful when they do choose to do the "heroic" thing. Discovery has been for my money one of the better Trek Season one's, if the show does the usual trek tighten up around mid season 2, i imagine it gets even better as the cast locks in on more chemistry with itself. the delima scinarios seem realistic to me because people when they choose a thing, tend to justify it as the right thing to do. Regardless if it was or not. Initially I was a little thrown off by the Klingon look, but given the Real life predjudices that I see in our real life world how dehumanizing the rhetoric can be, so I actually see the benefit of making the klingons look initially less human, Ive appreciated how they start to seem more human the longer the crew interacts with them. The practical make up effects have been very good to get back to. My biggest pleased moment about the cast is just how not high and mighty the federation is. It's a more realisitic depiction of cooperation sure humanity has evolved since our times now, but they're still human. The Federation has a sense of Honor the same as the klingons, it comes down to the individual crewperson choosing to do the honorable thing because its not an inherent biological trait of evolution, it is making a choice not a biological function. Its one of the first treks Ive seen where pretty much anyone could pick a member of the crew and see themselves instead of having to make inferences or introducing a special guest star like Barclay. My biggest griefs have been that the mirror universe would have been more satisfying to be a season 2 finale twist, give us two seasons with Lorca but I feel like that was the showrunners not knowing they were going to really get a season 2 so all payoffs happen same season, but thats more a problem with streaming series over all not just new trek.I just can’t stand the forced emotion in disco. The writers tell rather than show. It’s lazy and a bit condescending
I also hate how contrived it can be. I hated when they spent an episode rushing a bunch of last minute character development for a background character so they could kill her off for an emotional reaction in that same episode (voyager level laziness, right there). It felt cheap and inorganic. It told me the writers don’t want to take any real chances or have any real stakes—they just manufacture high stakes when it suits them, so they can pretend to be edgy and dark and Wheaton will suck their dicks on his little fluff after show.
The best part of Disco is the semi regular guests like Mudd, Pike, etc. It’s a problem when your guests are more interesting than your cardboard main cast—sure, DS9 arguably did this, but they also had a solid main cast to bounce the stellar semi regulars off of. With disco, there’s nothing to work with. Also, everyone is so snarky and mean spirited all the time. It’s tiresome. Conflict is good, but the writers lazily think everyone acting like spoiled turds and dicks equals conflict (it doesn’t). I get why it works for Lorca and Empress, because everyone in the mirror universe is a dick, but having everyone in the prime universe be that dickish is kind of a bummer. Tilly is a breath of fresh air for that reason. This is the first Trek show I’ve watched that I come away from thinking, “I would actually not want to live in this universe or be a part of this crew”
I’ve only watched half of season one of SNW, but already prefer it to the two seasons of disco I watched.
For all of the criticisms of nu trek as being too woke, I actually find it decidedly unwoke and a bit regressive in its moralizing and failure to give audiences anything to think or ponder over about ethical dilemmas—another reason why telling is inferior to showing. It’s just grimdark bullshit and it makes sense it was developed in the wake of shit like GoT’s popularity. Prodigy is meh but may come closest of any nu trek series to giving us some form of enlightened sensibilities. I want to watch Trek to be uplifted and see a better world, not to be bummed out between flashy overproduced space battles. I want to be given interesting ethical dilemmas that don’t always have a clear right or wrong answer and spend the next several hours or days pondering said dilemmas and really thinking. Disco makes the mistake of giving you a dilemma scenario and then telling you the right answer. It’s insulting and condescending