• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Racist Anti-Tech Hollywood: From Dr. Fu Manchu to AI

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730

These days, by the numbers it skews more South Asian. Also, rapidly growing are Latin American and African immigrants in tech.
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730

 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730



Gizmo: The Model Minority

gremlin

Gremlins is not often thought of as a Christmas movie, even though it takes place in a snowy small town that could double as the set of It’s a Wonderful Life, and the entire plot revolves around the unintended consequences of holiday gift-giving. It is funny to think back and remember that unscrupulous advertisers led the public to believe that Gremlins was a family picture about cute, fuzzy creatures. After parents marched out of theaters with children traumatized by the blood-spattered, if cartoonish horror-film aspects of the film, the ensuing controversy led to the creation of the first-ever PG-13 rating. (The old system skipped directly from PG to R.)

In Gremlins, then, we not only have one of the most popular examples of a Christmas film that dares to deviate from Christmas cliches; we also have a case study of a classic moral panic from the 1980s, the decade of satanic ritual abuse and razorblades in Halloween candy. Gremlins was one of the top films of 1984, along with venerable hits Beverly Hills Cop and Ghostbusters, and its box office far surpassed other Christmas films with a dark streak, like Bad Santa.

In the 1980s, a new breed of filmmakers (Steven Spielberg, Robert Zemeckis, John Landis) raided a storehouse of genres and cliches to give a grateful public popcorn entertainment of the first order. In the previous decade, a film industry long afflicted by the rise of television let a handful of eccentrics like Francis Ford Coppola and Robert Altman make dark, difficult films that eschewed happy endings and challenged American mores, but Steven Spielberg and George Lucas soon paved the way for a new era of crowd-pleasing kitsch by reviving monster movies (Jaws), Westerns (Star Wars), and adventure films (Raiders of the Lost Ark). Legend has it that filmmakers like Spielberg learned the vocabulary of genre film by watching reruns of old Hollywood schlock on TV as kids. This experience led them to regurgitate the tales of vampires, zombies and adventurers on the big screen. (Interestingly enough, more or less the same story has been told of Quentin Tarantino and his ilk in the 1990s, as a generation who stitched together their supposedly postmodern pastiche from the videos they watched in the 1970s and 1980s. When have artists not been reconstituting the last generation’s culture in the new?)


I, for one, welcome our Asian overlords
But Gremlins is more than a genre redo like Raiders of the Lost Ark or forerunner of postmodern kitsch. It is also a film that captures some genuine anxieties about race, immigration and globalization that appear in more recognizable form in other Eighties hits, like Gung Ho (1986). It is also keyed into a longing for innocence that is characteristic of the Reagan Era, a period of venality and class war and family values and Fifties nostalgia. Critic Noël Carroll sees a narrative arc in Gremlins and other Eighties films that tracks the experience of adolescence:

This kind of plot seems to appeal to young audiences because it is a kind of parable about growing up. It highlights the discovery of hidden knowledge, while also dramatizing a moment when adults are finally forced to listen seriously to the young. And many horror films stress biological deformity and Otherness, thus broaching adolescent anxieties about the body.

Gremlins mostly follows this storyline, most baldly when the hero, Billy, has to explain to the local authorities that the mischievous critters are real. (“I know it sounds crazy!”) And the gremlins certainly express fears about changing bodies and reproduction in gooey, graphic detail.

But the small, furry/reptilian little monsters must symbolize something else. As Carroll notes, Eighties films were also filled with zombies, vampires, aliens, and so forth. Each classic monster exemplifies one abiding fear or another. Crudely speaking, zombies symbolize mindless conformity and a ravenous mass consumerism; vampires, doubts about sexual boundaries. Some critics have alleged that gremlins portray a grotesque caricature of African Americans, which would not be surprising in the viciously racist era of the “welfare queen” and the crack epidemic, which was beginning to capture the nation’s attention in 1984. In Ceramic Uncles and Celluloid Mammies, Patricia Turner has criticized the film for imbuing the riotous ne’er-do-wells with the equivalent of blackface, as they feast on fried chicken and breakdance while wreaking havoc.



Turner’s theory is plausible enough—in a racist society, there’s a good chance that any tale of an impish, troublemaking Other may very well stand in for a racial minority in the minds of filmmakers and viewers. Coming at a time when politicians increasingly demonized the black poor as violent and irresponsible, the gremlins exhibited familiar qualities: poor impulse control, insatiable appetites, loud and reckless behavior. They are pure id, driven by desires not unlike the desperate drug addict, whose only pursuit is more pleasure.

However, one salient difference distinguishes the gremlins from the disparaged African American deviant: their foreign (indeed, Asian) origin. Mr. Peltzer buys the mogwai as a pet for his son Billy on a business trip. The film opens in Chinatown, where the traveling inventor and salesman purchases the peculiar species from a mysterious old Chinese man of the most stereotypical kind. The pet comes with several odd rules: do not get the animal wet (do not even give it water to drink), and never feed it after midnight. What will happen if one does of any of these things is not clear, though the instructions carry the implicit logic of the fairy tale, which telegraphs to viewers that the forbidden thing will, of course, be done later in the story.


Do you promise to not feed it and not walk it?
Despite its foreignness, the little creature (named “Gizmo”) appears good-natured. An animal that cannot even come into contact with water makes him even stranger, but his cuteness quickly wins the family over. When things do go wrong, though, Gizmo becomes the unwilling vehicle of uncontrollable forces: a splash of water causes him to enter a spasm of crazed reproduction, with little hairball babies sprouting out of his back. Even more disturbing is the metamorphosis that the little mogwais undergo when fed after midnight—they turn into slimy, scaly monsters, marked by gluttony and a desire to harm and torment the local townspeople. Liquid may connote sexuality, since Gizmo’s exposure to water results in his helpless virgin birth.

However innocent or well-meaning Gizmo may be, he still embodies a racist stereotype: that of the immigrant minority coming to this country and having too many kids, immortalized in liberal form by The Simpsons’ Apu and his eight children. The gremlins are a foreign menace that invades the Norman Rockwell-esque town and wantonly consumes its resources. They are also from Asia, home of the Japanese industrial juggernaut that threatened to sap American strength in films such as Gung Ho (1986) and Back to the Future II (1989). The gremlins foolishly try to imitate the ways of white, middle-class America (such as caroling) in their own inescapably demented fashion, like immigrants who are ridiculed for failing to adopt American mannerisms or speak English perfectly. More to the point, Japan and other Asian countries were often accused of copying/stealing American art, science, and technology to get ahead in the race for economic advantage during this period. (For example, in the early 1980s Jack Valenti, the notorious Hollywood spokesman, decried Sony’s videocassette recorder as a violent foreign parasite that would destroy American industry by allowing consumers to copy movies: “We are going to bleed and bleed and hemorrhage, unless this Congress at least protects one industry that is able to retrieve a surplus balance of trade and whose total future depends on its protection from the savagery and the ravages of this machine. … I say to you that the VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone.”)
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730


Reactions like the following are expected from the racist anti-tech crowd to movies like Everything, Everywhere, All at Once:
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730

However, we argue that this veneer of diversity fails to hold up to closer analysis, which exposes the show simultaneously advancing limited and retrograde representations of gender, race, and gamer identities. Further, we contend that these pernicious representations are not just a failure to be truly intersectional or progressive, but that they reveal how games and other popular media function as sites where the intersections of different axes of identity become explicitly marked, mocked, and deployed as justification for minimization and exclusion. We support this argument through the analysis of two of The Guild’s characters, Zaboo and Tinkerballa (Tink). As characters of color, Zaboo and Tink simultaneously grapple with norms of gender, race, and gamer identity; unfortunately, The Guild does not engage these overlapping challenges as opportunities to reshape norms, but rather reinforces them by foregrounding limited, cliched representations. By drawing on gendered and racialized stereotypes, the show centralizes Whiteness as a mythical norm, naturalizing its ongoing power in game spaces but also providing an opportunity to interrogate how such norms are perpetuated.
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730

This mostly about the misogyny in Chuck, but the Asian stereotypes are essentially the same as The Guild.
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730

"Yellow Peril" may have morphed to "Beige Peril" now as the US entertainment industry certainly seems to really like sexual stereotyping in pretty much all Asian characters in US entertainment that's not mainly Asian cast.
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730
The AI bit is more profound than I mentioned in the Op of this post. I mentioned it a bit in the TESCREAL Bundle thread.

However, there are real and current problems, like coded bias, exploited labor, and unequal access exacerbating inequality.

Instead, the media highlights sci-fi and possible future problems in the future. Coded bias, explored labor, and exacerbating inequality is happening now.

The regulations and laws ensuring that people have access to this technology should come before any laws dealing with the sci-fi future.

Anti-open-source in AI = White supremacy in AI at this moment. The reason is that people actively trying to address the current issues must do so outside the big AI labs.

The biases are in the data-collection itself. Even medicine and guidelines for healthy ranges are for certain ethnicities. AI is addressing these issues.

Until the TESCREAL hype became mainstream, AI ethics was focused on fairness and removing bias.

The automation issue has been happening since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. The TESCREAL bundle has been pedaling their hype for at least a decade.

Why is the timing of the various media and entertainment industries picking it up with such vim and vigor? Why now? I think you are kidding yourself if you don't believe that it's at least in part because the faces of the leaders are more brown.

Jensen Huang founded and runs Nvidia. Sudar Pichai runs Alphabet. Satya Nadella runs Microsoft. Arvind Srinivas founded and runs Perplexity.

Do you really believe the melanin in their faces had nothing to do with the timing?
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730
AI is just a fancy term for automation.

There are a lot of movements. Two in particular are diametrically opposed and fighting hard for hearts and minds.

Since painting with a broad brush is the norm in discussions around technology. I will do a bit of my own.

White Supremacist "good" Automation movementEgalitarian Automation movement
Position in Closed vs Open DebateClosed SourceOpen Source
Marketing MessagesAGI/ASI will destroy the world; therefore, we are the only ones who can make it.Labor needs tools to counteract the power of capital
SupportersWhite Supremacists, Hollywood Celebrities, and Economic entities ahead in AI and life in generalRando's on the internet, Economic entities behind in AI, and life in general
Future VisionA future where the "good people" have control over "digital God"A future where essential tools can be used for the specific needs of each community
Future FearA future where the "bad people" have control over "digital God"Absolute power in the hands of a few
Marketed FearAI will destroy the world through some sci-fi mechanism. Let's say paper-clip maximization. Yeah. That's the ticket.Absolute power in the hands of a few
How they reach conclusions"Rational Sci-Fi'ism" (that's the best I can describe it)Rational Empiricism
Intellectual LeadershipThe TESCREAL bundleAI for Good, DAIR, Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730
Generally speaking, in most domains, to make the best ethical and moral decisions, one would want to rely on the facts relevant to the situation rather than fiction.

But somehow, so much commentary, both public and private will have open admission to being (wilfully) ignorant of the science of the situation with AI, and then replacing where the facts they're ignorant about with fiction.

What's worse is, people will misrepresent their willfully ignorant understanding of the situation they currently have as the supposed official position of the scientists in the situation and claim that they were lied to when they learn more about the more nuanced truth.

The TESCREAL bundle made the core of the fear-hype bring about much less safe closed-opaque militarized corporate controlled future where almost no system has had enough development time to be reliable enough to be in production.

The entertainment industry is complicit in trying to make that happen.

The open, transparent, democratized future of specified, well-researched, engineered, targeted AI for known use cases is still possible as long as the fear-hype cycle can die down.

There are legitimate real concerns, like with any system that is engineered.

But fears about sentience and paperclip maximizer are far fetched distortions leading people to make the whole field less safe, and creating the very race dynamics the fear-hypists purport to avoid.
 
Last edited:

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730

Wherever we have online meetups of just people discussing things to understand things(paper readings for example), we'll have zoom bombers doing exactly this sort of thing.

I've been dealing with the racist tropes these zoom bombers spew all my life (and I do believe Hollywood is the source of most of the tropes).

'Far right forces' would have been my belief for the source of the hate five or six years ago, but these days the left-right line (especially for Asian hate) is not so clear.
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730
Again, I've been dealing with racist tropes all my life, and I do believe Hollywood is the source of most of the tropes.

But I realize the forces are more insidious the more I think about it.

The right will come out and say things like calling people coming from "shithole countries" and calling them "rapists."

The left will do things subtly, like flood the dominant images of the culture with sexual stereotypes and branding anyone fighting for causes they care about as "bros" (e.g., Yang bros), when there are plenty of people of all genders who care about functioning urban centers and want technology.

The sheer number of brown people playing characters on popular shows and movies that range somewhere between an embarrassment and an insult, with sexual overtones, is undeniable.

You could pick a random popular TV show or movie that isn't basically a full Asian cast (especially if the number of brown characters is small, especially if male) and you can guarantee sexual deviancy in the character.

"Big Bang Theory" - Raj, "That 70's Show" - Fez, "Parks and Rec" - Tom, "Mean Girls" - Kevin, and so on. The Big Bang Theory held a top spot for about a decade. To be clear, I am not saying these are bad shows or to cancel them. I like them, in fact. However, the pattern reveals something insidious being placed into the broader culture.

In as much a bro culture is real, it's a problem and needs to be addressed.

But Asian hate always has a sexual component to it, and I would not discount that either.
 
Last edited:

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730
The same is happening with words. An "algorithm" is simply a series of steps specific enough to be executed to get particular results. Modern algorithms have probabilistic elements, just like if people implemented the same steps.

Some people like to use the word "algorithm" as a fear tactic because it elicits the Middle Eastern origins of the word, which essentially means the same thing as "rules and procedures."

Who controls the procedures (or algorithms) is important. How to place checks and balances into the algorithms (or procedures) is important. Finally, whether you mechanized the procedure(or algorithm) is a question to taken up, case-by-case.
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730
When talking about economics, even pointing out that there is a supply side to think about is used to lump in with the supply side economists. There is both supply and demand. Pointing out that both exist should not lead to the vitriol that it does.

But then these kind of makes sense, when you think about the fact that brown people make up more of those creating the supply side of the economy, from tech support to maids. In contrast, the intellectual pontificators are primarily white or pass for white.
 
Top