Let's face it: In the grand scheme of things, if you polled 10,000 random people, being a "member of a psychology website which classes people based on 16 archetypes" is, well, pretty nerdy.![]()
I'm both.
I'm a nerd in that I'm: A computer science major, I spend a lot of my time playing with computers/playing games, I'm pretty anti-social/socially anxious, and I don't actually hate math. I also have a habit of having random electrical projects/fixing electronics, like how I currently have a half-built solar panel on my desk and just replaced the LCD screen in my blackberry tonight. I also have no interest in any type of substance that affects my state of mind (Caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol included).
I'm not in that I'm: Someone who thinks jumping off cliffs on skis is a good idea, hikes to insanity, enjoys motorcycles, dirt bikes, ATV's, Jetskis, and anything else that has the potential for being interesting to ride/drive. (Like mountain bikes), am a good enough machinist that I can pretty much do anything in a metal shop.
Basically, it comes down to: I like pushing my body and abilities to see what is possible in whatever it is I want to do. Whether it's seeing if I actually CAN hike 14 miles with 9300ft of elevation change in a day, or if I can learn Russian quickly, I put a lot into what I do.
No one is really all that perfect nerd or "cool" guy, although in their public image, they sometimes might be.
You mean... I'm a... nerd?![]()
Let's face it: In the grand scheme of things, if you polled 10,000 random people, being a "member of a psychology website which classes people based on 16 archetypes" is, well, pretty nerdy.![]()
Well, I never... So you define "nerd" based on fallacy of argumentum ad populum? Democracy is not your friend, my dear.
I know I'm partly nerd but that does not qualify me for the grand honor of "Nerd" worthiness.
I consider "nerd"'s definition dependent on it being a subtrait of being "special". You look at a hundred samples of the world, you notice a slight variance. These digressions forms our several popular but subconsciously derived patterned simplifications of "freak", "nerd", "geek" etc.
When one is noticeably different, in an extreme form centered on one theme(intellect, novelty, obsession etc), one can be considered as fitting for such grand titles. Thus, via the fact that titles originate from intelligent evolutionary innate decision, "Nerd" must cooperatively be defined as so.
The definition of 'extreme', on the other hand, is based on the common denominator of all humans.
My sister could be a nerdy ISTP I think? Would you consider Paul Bunyan nerdy?
Titay?
I have always been a nerd in hiding.
An MIT nerd is different then a RPG nerd. One lives in sci-fi fantasy and one lives in reality fantasy. They do mix, but they are not the same type of nerdiness.
My sister could be a nerdy ISTP I think? Would you consider Paul Bunyan nerdy?