I don't think the issue is the absurdity of any religious practices.
It's more that Donald Trump is best critiqued on what he does as a president, in action through policy, administrative appointment etc (without ignoring the role of the structure/s that surround him). It's just too easy to mock, curse or generally make light of him, particularly in appearance.
It's partly because of this that decent & 'objective' (or equivalent of) journalism concerning him is so hard to find. It's very often blindly in favour or blindly against and this only encourages entrenched opinions and oppositional approaches to different perspectives.
I'm not telling people what they should or shouldn't be doing, by all means continue (it's not like I'm the arbiter of being impartial). It's just that, to me, there seems to be an unhelpful disregard from both those who like & dislike him.
If he makes a good move: notice it. If he makes a bad move: notice it. But I don't think letting a positive or negative bias carry the narrative too strongly is that useful.
Although some of the jokes have been good.
