^In the context of this thread: past experiences, limited facts of these two acquaintances in a newly forming relationship, and my positive view of the world. My calculations have served me well.
So you're not actually saying to take reality as it is, but rather to use
your preferred interpretive lens. It's important not to get those things confused.
Understood. We're on the same page. Again, when two people first meet, there's little to go on, and one of the key players is terrified of confronting the other key player; obviously, more actions are required before passing a firm character judgement. However, more actions will not happen, if the OP makes false assumptions and reacts accordingly. I'm suggesting she make the positive assumption that her friend has good intentions, until proven otherwise. That's the healthy approach. My reasoning is within the context of the details provided in this thread.
And I'M saying that deferring character judgment by ignoring or rationalizing worrisome actions, under the mistaken belief that you don't have enough information, or that you're being closed-minded/too negative/paranoid, does nothing but waste your time and energy AND needlessly make you vulnerable to personal injury. And I don't think you're in a position to say what's a "healthy approach" or not.
It seems that we do agree that assuming the worst too soon/on too little evidence AND hanging on blindly in the face of damning evidence are both unhealthy/irrational approaches to relationships. Where we disagree, however, is on the following:
(1) Assuming the best of people. (I think it's best to be neutral or slightly wary.)
(2) The OP does not have enough info to make a judgment. (I think she does.)
I'm not sure they're at that point yet of executing, "I want this relationship to work out"; meaning, I think they're still acquaintences.
Yeah, it was an example. That's what "e.g.," means. You didn't think that I literally meant to suggest that "I want this relationship to work out" was either party's actual intention, did you?
Do you want to fight??
...cuz I'm not disagreeing with ya.
Yes I do, and yes you are.

You even disagree with me that we're disagreeing. Haha.
But if you agree with this, then why wouldn't you agree that the OP has enough information to go on to make a judgment?