Daedalus
New member
- Joined
- May 16, 2010
- Messages
- 185
- MBTI Type
- INTJ
- Enneagram
- 5
I saw this movie this Sunday and it was well worth it. Probably one of the best movies ive seen, ever!
And as a lucid dreamer, i can totally relate to it. Interestingly enough, i started a thread on lucid dreaming a few months before on typc
http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/bonfire/31070-question-about-odd-dreaming-process.html
^^
Some replies to some posts above mine, might contain spoilers
It depends, some lucid dreams can be very logical and seem as if its the real thing. especially so when one wakes up from a dream within a dream in a lucid dream....one can even feel "relief"...and even think "oh phew..that was just a dream"..when in a dream itself. it has happened to me quite a few times.
also another thing i experienced is that the entire world..or city or place the dream takes in need not be meticulously crafted...that's why i do not get the "architect" thing...for me at least when i open a door in a lucid dream...it looks like a room...with furnishings/look based on what type of room it is(in that particular dream). Its as if we create the surrounding "on demand" and not ahead of time.
also in the movie, Cobb says to Ariadne something along the lines of
"Dont worry too much about the details, set up the big picture and people will fit it up with details"
I think so too

I seem to think along these lines as well...the ..."washing up om the shore/raising up from a sea" motif seems to be repeated quite often in this movie.
maybe it signifies transitions between different layers of the collective unconscious...or even going deeper and deeper within ones own conscious
I read somewhere that in real dreams, "near infinite" dream time might occur within just a few seconds of real time. So i think the inceptions time-scale...even though it grows exponentially as one traverses the layers, is still slower than actual dream time.
but its a pretty nifty idea
the way they explained it in the movie
And as a lucid dreamer, i can totally relate to it. Interestingly enough, i started a thread on lucid dreaming a few months before on typc
http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/bonfire/31070-question-about-odd-dreaming-process.html
^^
Some replies to some posts above mine, might contain spoilers
The thing that bothered me about this movie was that the dreams weren't very... dreamlike, you know?
It depends, some lucid dreams can be very logical and seem as if its the real thing. especially so when one wakes up from a dream within a dream in a lucid dream....one can even feel "relief"...and even think "oh phew..that was just a dream"..when in a dream itself. it has happened to me quite a few times.
also another thing i experienced is that the entire world..or city or place the dream takes in need not be meticulously crafted...that's why i do not get the "architect" thing...for me at least when i open a door in a lucid dream...it looks like a room...with furnishings/look based on what type of room it is(in that particular dream). Its as if we create the surrounding "on demand" and not ahead of time.
also in the movie, Cobb says to Ariadne something along the lines of
"Dont worry too much about the details, set up the big picture and people will fit it up with details"
The film can appeal to Ne just as much as it does to Ni. The film is like a web of dreams and symbols and hidden meanings, with each detail leading to a new insight/meaning. I think Ns in general will really go for this film, as it's action with an enigmatic twist.
.
I think so too
This movie is Ni. Its about reality having layers. Symbols are more than just drawings, even representations of time, perception etc, all can represent other things in a layered view of reality. The ocean sort of made me think of the "collective unconscious" as Jung would put it.
I think both are in fact possible, but I lean towards the second only because the dradle noise indicated that it was slowing![]()
I seem to think along these lines as well...the ..."washing up om the shore/raising up from a sea" motif seems to be repeated quite often in this movie.
maybe it signifies transitions between different layers of the collective unconscious...or even going deeper and deeper within ones own conscious
I've seen it twice and my favorite aspect is *spoiler alert* going to white...
Is the time folding itself over and multiplying. On the first level of the dream it's only 30 seconds, while on the fourth it's days. I like Nolan's back tracking to the first level of the dream where the van was falling, I found it funny.
If I remember right Cobb talks about Limbo being the remenants of the last person who resided within it, thus the reason why it's Cobb's 'limbo'. I think the closeness of the people in the dream does make sense from them to be collectively in the same limbo.
I read somewhere that in real dreams, "near infinite" dream time might occur within just a few seconds of real time. So i think the inceptions time-scale...even though it grows exponentially as one traverses the layers, is still slower than actual dream time.
but its a pretty nifty idea