Hey. Thanks for the response again. I see what you are saying. But what do Cholerics do instead with emotional energy in the area of Affection? I must be missing something here.
Taking the quote from you, "to what extent you want others to show warmth and support to you" I do want some of that from others, for sure and I'm able to respond to that. If that's not there, then I will not be doing much emotionally. I will be distant etc etc.
I don't know how we would separate it from Choleric in Affection, essentially.
Choleric in Affection expresses a lot of affection, but actually doesn't want deep personal relationships, despite manipulating others into giving them love and affection. So I don't think it fits you quite very well, which is why you got a higher percentage for Melancholy Phlegmatic in Affection.
Another very interesting thing is how the Five Temperaments merge tactics when blended with Phlegmatic

: for example, a Supine manipulates others into taking care of them and making nearly all their decisions for them by being domineering, but instead, a Phlegmatic Supine would use their wry sense of humour in order to manipulate others into taking care of them.
It not only does not come naturally but I have an aversion and distaste for it. So this does not seem fitting advice for me. What is the essence of the advice for Choleric in Affection again? I must be missing something there as I am not seeing the essence of it, the main point of it and so on.
The Melancholy Phlegmatic expresses like a Melancholy, but responds like a Phlegmatic. Melancholy Phlegmatic in Affection means you appear to be a Melancholy in Affection on the outside (giving little love and affection to others), but on the inside, you really want the same as a Phlegmatic in Affection (a moderate amount of love and affection on both sides of the relationship). So they do have an aversion to showing their real feelings; they are very emotionally guarded, in fact, the Phlegmatic reinforces this. On the other hand, a Choleric in Affection is actually open and affectionate.
Again same issue/question. Choleric in Affection does not do this? If it does, then how do you separate it from Choleric in Inclusion and in Control? If it does not, then what does it do instead?
Hope my questions are clear enough.
Choleric in Inclusion has high expressed Inclusion (eI) and low wanted Inclusion (wI) (approaches many people, but wishes to associate with only a few people: a fast-paced and tough-minded selective extrovert), Choleric in Control has high expressed Control (eC), low wanted Control (wC) (wants a lot of control over others, but will tolerate little control over their life: an angry and critical independent dominator), Choleric in Affection has high expressed Affection (eA), low wanted Affection (wA) (they give a lot of affection to others, but reject love from others: an affectionate and self-centered indirect manipulator).
Melancholy Phlegmatic in Affection has low expressed Affection (eA), moderate wanted Affection (wA) (they express little affection to others, but want a moderate amount from others: a faithful and loyal selective observer).
Melancholy Phlegmatic in Affection is faithful and loyal,
but only if treated properly 
. If not treated properly, they will become antagonistic and take their revenge.
@
DewyWind
Me again. Choleric in Affection:
Temperament: Choleric in Affection
"Has a hard time relating to the deep, tender feelings of others - views “hurt feelings†and tears as sentimental trivia that are not called for."
That's what I'm like with the deep feelz, yeah. Tho' this is true for both mine and other people's. I would not be as rude as to talk like that openly though. I used to be less careful a long time ago tho.
Edit: I mean as I got older (not very old mind you) I've tried to be more and more careful and respect them more both in myself and others but then I had enough of it not too long ago. I feel that was too much not myself anymore. So I decided to ignore them again and even be disdainful and angry about them and frankly I'm feeling much more comfortable that way. I feel more in control that way yeah well. If that's Choleric in Control ok, but what the hell is Choleric in Affection then. Do they just use charm to control and dominate the relationship and place conditions on the love and that's all there's to it? I.e. their affections are all fake, for the purpose of control in the relationship? The one way I'm able to control/dominate is not by using charm, it's done by anger. I cannot (and will not) do it by using charm.
Then you must be Choleric Compulsive in Control and not Choleric in Affection, because a Choleric in Affection manipulates others into giving them love and affection, and yet rejects the genuine love and affection of others; all while using charm and behaving warmly and personably in order to maintain control of the relationship. Choleric Compulsive in Control simply uses intimidation and yelling in order to control others.
"Places conditions on the love he/she gives and receives."
This makes a lot of sense too.
But I don't consciously "Uses charm (behaving warm and personably) to maintain control of deep, personal relationships". Yes I can be charming but it's usually not intentionally done. It just happens. And I don't think I believe I can maintain control of the relationship directly. I can directly control things related to the relationship, but not the relationship itself. When I tried to control the relationship itself (without trying to use warm personable charm tho', mind you), ... that doesn't work with everyone. It does seem to work with more Supine types I think. But is a disaster for others e.g. for Sanguine-ish people.
Melancholy Phlegmatic in Affection sets criteria for deep relationships, too. Supine in Control is very indirect in many ways: they are dependent on others and weak-willed (which may be why your grip of control worked), yet they manipulate others using guilt. Sanguine in Control is very independent (even though they swing into dependency mode sometimes), which is why that may not've worked.
EDIT: reading all that again (from that archived website), I definitely relate to two temperaments in Affection and the rest I don't relate to or clearly relate less - Phlegmatic Choleric and Phlegmatic Melancholy (and a few traits of Choleric and Choleric Phlegmatic fit too). Not sure yet which would win out here
I don't know if any of those (except Choleric Phlegmatic, but even they are affectionate to others too, so probably not) would work or be accurate because all of them (except Choleric Phlegmatic) want little to no love or affection from the other person in their relationship, but you seem to want some love and affection (as you said, "I think I want some, not like "very little"). A true Choleric in Affection would
give a lot of love and affection, but reject love and affection from other people (as you said, "it is hard for me to reject emotional expressions of these"). On the contrary, a Melancholy Phlegmatic expresses little love and affection, yet wants a moderate amount from both ends of the relationship.