Well I voiced my opinion, and then others wanted to debate my opinion, and I have more of a Gamma than Delta way of expressing myself, in that I often speak with very clear assertiveness if I find something to either be Te factual or an Fi value of mine. I also find that this forum has some kind of "conditioning" effect on me where I automatically come across as more aggressive here than on any other web site I visit, and I think that has to do with early trauma here of being bullied by domineering members of the forum who acted like if I did not speak in an aggressive tone, that I should GTFO.
That being said, I believe I said something to Fia along the lines of "I know this sounds terrible but..." so I didn't just say "hey that kid is satan."
No one has to engage with me or challenge my opinion, but if they do, I am more than happy to argue with them, though they're going to get what they asked for and not:
My opinion on this matter isn't going to come across as "politically correct" because I'm very clear on what I see in this child's expression...and I strongly disagree with you, Vas seemed to be completely supportive of this kind of therapy and the conclusion that a child could be healed by it.
Just like if someone yells something doesn't automatically mean they're right, if someone says something "nicely" enough it doesn't mean they're right, either, it just means they're trying to be polite, and a lot of people are swayed by politeness rather than facts or reason.
I do probably go on gut instinct in some ways in a more reliable manner, and it may just be a difference in what forms of perception and judgment have served you best in life.
On the other hand, yes, I'm going to become frustrated and seem irritable if I see people speculating about a bunch of garbage that isn't based in psychiatry or psychology, and is more trailing off into socially conditioned responses such as "but it's just a child" and "wait people said my kids eyes are strange too."
Other people in this thread said things like they wouldn't like Beth to baby-sit their children, suggested that she may use needles on her patients in a sadistic manner given her childhood habits, or that if she wasn't a sociopath before the treatment, she is one now.
But I say I think she has a socipath's eyes and all of a sudden everyone freaks out. What that says to me is this is Fe ethical conditioning, perhaps, or some kind of off-topic emotional response based on false comparisons to one's own loved ones.