So you are saying that INTP's do not come to conclusions, and then follow those conclusions with even more? In other words you are saying that INTP's do not start with a premise and then after much thinking develop a conclusion that may be quite far from where they originally started? Well that is exactly what Einstein did...and Darwin...and lots of other people commonly typed as INTP. Either Einstein is not an INTP or INTP's do go from conclusion to conclusion reaching results far from the beginning. Which one is it?
I think you are confused. First the "definition" you posted is not even a definition. It is a
fragment taken from a
description. A description is not a definition and a fragment is even less so. Secondly and more importantly the fragment says that Ti chooses the right
word. It does not say that Ti users are incapable of putting together a whole sentence or even a whole paragraph. It says that Ti users choose their words carefully.
You haven't really said much of anything other than BW isn't INTP, because he's not like other INTP's. Well he isn't like INTJ's either. He isn't like most other people in general. If you are so certain about his type, then why not post your reasoning process. From my perspective you only seem to be misinterpreting what I am saying because you do not like my conclusion.
Go read seveal INTP and INTJ blogs and then get back to me.
I do not see how I am spinning anything. You have taken a fragment of a description and called it a definition, and then you misinterpreted that fragment. That seems like spin to me. I am trying to clarify the original meaning.