Yes, but I couldn't furnish it
immediately. It'd probably be the European Journal of Psychology, but I can't recall. Right off the bat though, I have
this:
That's from a blog... where's their source?
If you think about it, that blog probably got their information from a small scale study; which is unreliable. That's how most typology studies are made. Besides, they aren't even thinking in terms of the functions. Wouldn't the N doms have the highest IQ, if, by their logic, intuition makes someone the most intelligent out of the preferences? Most EN_Ps and IN_Js I've met have been insanely smart.
And another thing to think about, a lot of very intelligent people score as intuitive types because of how tests are made. Tests are unreliable, the only way that you would be able to make an actual study on MBTI types would be to get people who have studied type and everything about it. Not just find some random people and give them a test. That's a recipe for failure. I'm sure that a lot of these "INTJs" are just insanely smart ISTJs.
Personally, when I take the test I score as pretty much every I__P depending on my mood. If I was put in a study, I'd have to intentionally take the test with getting ISFP in mind, not how I actually am.
I personally think that the insane sensor bias here is just against people who aren't on par with the complainer's intellect, or they don't have similar kinds of intellect. Type doesn't really have to do with that. I mesh well with both sensors and intuitives who are smart, the preference doesn't really mean anything. It just makes conversations more interesting. The real divide is intelligence.