I reckon that in much of the world religion has proven itself to be the most enduring and evolving, in the sense of adaptativeness, of institutions, its outlived communism and arguably is in the process of out living capitalism and its ideological appendages, the societies which are based upon objective or accidential atheism seem to be suffering from a myriad of problems, personal and social, therefore is it not worth while to give religion analytical attention if not praise?
Plus, given Eric Fromm's frame of reference or definition that ideas which provide an ethical orientation and devotional object qualify as "religious", which I think is sound, there are a lot of accidential religions out there, they're mainly bad religions, like the idolatrous or atavistic religions or superstitions of the ancient world.
NB Bitches.
Plus, given Eric Fromm's frame of reference or definition that ideas which provide an ethical orientation and devotional object qualify as "religious", which I think is sound, there are a lot of accidential religions out there, they're mainly bad religions, like the idolatrous or atavistic religions or superstitions of the ancient world.
NB Bitches.
Last edited: