1. How is providing evidence contrary to your ungrounded statement revealing bias, exactly? Now there's a rhetorical question.
2. I suppose she kept her name secret from her SO because she's "out there," and perhaps fearful.
3. Of course she could find a suitor by merely walking outside. But she finally gave in to Larry. The balance eventually tipped toward the need for affection.
4. Yeah, she stopped being in love with Dan, because he violated her values (very important to ENFP), and broke his heart instead of the other way around.
All of this is easily attributable to a quirky ENFP, I've seen similar behavior in them.
He wanted her. That's affection.The thing with Larry was NOT about affection - give me a break!
I never said she was completely healthy, in fact I agree with you. I used the euphemism "quirky" to be nice.Bottom-line: She's a slapper who likes to mindf*ck.
If she's an ENFP, she's a pretty damned unhealthy one.
Contradictions perhaps between what I said in one place and what you thought I meant somewhere else, but no. And I'm not. I simply very much think the character was ENFP, and I certainly don't think fictional characters are always typable. She is very real.Lots of contradictions in your arguments here. I think you just argue for the sake of arguing.
Interesting.
A few revisions (insofar as my opinion allows):
Ra's Al Ghul - INTJ.
Bruce Wayne - ISTP/INTJ
The Bride (Kill Bill) - xNTJ
Fox Mulder - INFP
I was pretty certain he was an ISTP until the third movie. I'm still not sure that he's an ISTJ though. Somebody convince me of something.Only saw the first movie but from what I remember, Jason Bourne seemed more ISTP-ish to me.
Only saw the first movie but from what I remember, Jason Bourne seemed more ISTP-ish to me.
Ra's Al Ghul was not an INTJ. His purpose in life was to serve the clan, to honor its tradition, to rid world of corruption and decadence, and he was willing to die for that cause. That's an ISTJ right there.
Maybe our central rub is in reconciling his intellect against his avowed behavior. Ra's is offered as a genius; a living embodiment of transcendent willpower. His attitudes and perspectives therefore conform more to the focus of this gift.
It's a common trap for an NT to fall for - the assumption that true genius can only appear within NT personality.
Or that temperament suggests capability in understanding what someone wrote...
...No counterpoints to my analysis of Ra's, then?
Not sure what is the crux of your argument that Ra's was an INTJ.
The fact that he tempted Bruce Wayne to break one of his ethical rules?
Not even slightly.
I've already explained my judgment.
You countered with a generalization that lacked basic connection to anything I've offered.
You haven't offended me in the slightest.
I was hoping for a legitimate exchange of ideas. I could be incorrect in my assessment of Ra's as INTJ - as yet, I haven't encountered adequate countermeasures to my offered points.
No worries, Edgar.
You haven't offended me in the slightest.
I was hoping for a legitimate exchange of ideas. I could be incorrect in my assessment of Ra's as INTJ - as yet, I haven't encountered adequate countermeasures to my offered points.
No worries, Edgar.
What's the cabbage-head in you avatar about, Night?
What's the cabbage-head in you avatar about, Night?
I googled "waistcoat" and found the little scamp tucked (strangely) in an article on finance.