You mean the western ideals or Islamic rule?
Islamic rule, as doled out by extremists.
The issue is not when Islamist destroy the rights of their own people in their own lands, the issue is when they emigrate to secular democratic nations (usually nations with high living standards like European nations, Nothern America or Australia), gain all the comforts privileges freedom and equal rights of these lands - which are not allowed in Islamic lands -, and when grow in population ask Sharia Law to be implemented, threaten to kill anyone who questions Islam, threaten to kill the Jews and control even non-muslim women, rape the women who don't cover themselves up and then try to rule the country they emigrated into according to Islamic methods (which have never been successful in any nation which they have been implemented on).
When Islamists make issue in African and Asian nations one can argue that their rights may have been violated, but when they go to some of these secular democratic nations with high living standards and ask Sharia to be implemented it's high time you admit that there is an Elephant in the room.
You're missing the point that I made. These reactions by the extremists are exactly that,
reactions, motivated by geopolitical agenda. They're not happening in a bubble, isolated from any influence outside themselves. It seems you're not very educated about the evolution and rise of Islamic Terrorism, and the gradual rise of fundamentalism.
These extremists feel justified, in whatever twisted logic they have, to enforce their ideals into new territories, especially the secular, democratic West, because they feel that the West have been doing the same to them. Hence, my analogy. Rebelling against the authoritarian rule by turning into authoritarians themselves. "You did it to us. We're coming to you." The West have been going into THEIR countries, telling them how to live, "liberating" them, and waging wars that ravages their countries and their people.
When I say, "control your own actions", this is what I speak of. Rather than doing the blame game, which is rather ridiculous, ignorant and lazy (and dangerous), the West has to look at its own actions that contributed to the creation of such evil. And, cease and desist.
Why did they go to Iraq? Weapons of mass destruction?
Why is the West supporting Israel?
Fallout of the Cold War...
And many, many more........
It's interesting that the West, in its pure, noble pursuit to liberate oppressed people from tyrannical rule, has focused the majority of its energy on the Islamic states, while leaving civil war torn countries in Africa to deal with their own warloads and utter terror, with a few soldiers/UN sent as aid (compared to the military force they deploy for the Middle East). The torture that had been experienced by the people of Congo makes ISIS look like kindergarten kids. Why is nothing being done? Because it's contained. Let them kill each other. Let Africa burn. Yet, why not employ the same logic to the Middle East? Because the West has been entangled with them for far too long. The history of how Islamic Terrorism evolved cannot be written without mentioning the key involvement of the West. And now, the tension has reached its climax. And, interestingly enough, the West hasn't touched Saudi Arabia. Geopolitical motivations.
To focus on Islam, the religion, as the culprit for the rise of terrorists is a diversion from the real elephant in the room. These terrorists are using religion as a shield, as a justification, and you're buying their marketing.