SillySapienne
`~~Philosoflying~~`
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2008
- Messages
- 9,801
- MBTI Type
- ENFP
- Enneagram
- 4w5
I swear, it is precisely nights like these when I think this forum attracts certifiably insane people.
Okay, well, I'd really enjoy hearing about it whenever you have the time. I don't mean that as a challenge--I'm genuinely curious to hear what you have to say about it, as I'm sure you're more familiar with Nietzsche than I am.
INTJs do tend to be intelligent, wanna cookie?
As for social and interpersonal intelligence, *in general*, like your INTP bruthas, y'all tend to suckus maximus.
If INTJ's are "intelligent" what about its opposite, ESFP? Even stereotypes have possible connections.
Hahahahaa, been all about fractals (cognizantly) since 5th or 6th grade.
Ok, enough about retards, let's talk about absolute truth.
What is absolute truth and how can it be perceived and differentiated from mere false perception of absolute truth?
No.
For many reasons no, but primarily, wouldn't that be a reward?
/jk
(I can get all Fi on this, but I'm too tired)
Firstly, you must decide whether or not reality exists outside of your perception, or whether your perception of reality is all that there is. Most reasonable people choose the former.
Secondly, you need to realize that "absolute truth" itself is relative to its observer, and that it doesn't describe reality (the universe as it is with everything in it) unless you stipulate "absolute truth" to mean reality. However, defining reality and all that is in it will not answer "why?" questions, only "how?" Therefore, defining "absolute truth" is silly and shows the height of philosophical ignorance, especially considering that this is a question philosophers (people far more qualified and intelligent than anybody on this thread) have attempted to answer for millenia.
Why can we never answer this question? Because it is entirely contingent upon human perception, and any being (save an all knowing God that resides outside of the material universe, who himself is a human construct) humans can possibly conceive. Therefore, philosophy will always be limited due to human perception.
I agree with everything you wrote, here.
Seriously.
It disgusts me that you people are actually allowed to discuss Nietzsche or these cliched questions.
Do you believe that the next Martin Heidegger resides on this forum? I know that he doesn't, as it isn't me, so how could he?
I just had an in depth conversation around a week ago about Why and How questions regarding physics/the physical universe, and human beings/the human experience.
We deduced pretty much what you wrote Lex, that's why I am kinda surprised/shocked.