Ti=a monologue. descriptive. thats it, take it or leave it. if it's is little snippets in a forum, it can take dialoge form. and if you think of a series of essays in a scientific newspaper as dialoge then yes its can be seen as dialoge, but its essentially a monologe, missing theory of mind.
it tries to convince by being coherent and eventually even by mentioning some proofs, but it does not bother to integrate into different views that may be held by the reader. it does not try to compare, compete, synthesize. it tries to be an example.
it wants to be seen, but not by some one else's eyes, but tries to force you to see the whole thing through its own eyes. there is an arrogant version that jumps into the room "see here, super hawt new theory" and there is a modest, completely dry version like "some footnotes about boring stuff". both versions are not effective in their advertising.
both versions of presentation don't try to convince by pretending an imaginary, reacting dialoge, but by being what they are. again, descriptive.
this is very similar to Fi arguing about morals, by illustrating an example, rather than explaining, which given ways are coming from where and going to where, thus evaluating the best ways.
both Fi and Ti can be deconstuctive, which might seem a little bit more like a dialoge.
we all know the Ti guy, who studies jura, and tries to deconstruct the whole idea of laws, because he deems them fundamentally unjust or amorally, intruding human dignity or something. but it's monologe like in how he focuses on the system of his expertise, on what it does, rather than how it is embedded into the world, how the world is doing things with the system.
he tends to personify the law, either loves or hates it.
a TiNe guy, in that juvenile deconstructive phase is like a jurist who believes in being "an advocate of the law of anarchy", while an NeTi guy is an "anarchist who believes in the strategical (a)buse of the law of the system". only the Ti-dominant guy is a clear example for how Ti-values try to be an example, that rises over a given standart, that is deemed so low, that Ti hardly wants to pay any attention to it.
in comparsion, a TeNi guy, on that level, will want to get his hands dirty, go into dialoge with the existing system, modify it from the inside out, peace by peace, rather that reinventing it fully.
with NiTe guys or NiFe guys its ambigous, because, while their Te/Fe is the same, it's their dominant Ni that does sort or reinvent the whole system, by purifying the vision.
but the Te/Fe is still throwing it self into dialoge, in the process of applying. it will differentiate the purified vision from the corrupt vision, by dialoge/comparsion.