1) I pointed out a false assessment which you posited- that an ENFP using Ti would necessarily look like an ENTP- which still holds true as an example of logical inconsistency.
2) I made it clear that in the
hypothetical scenario that you were offended, it would be further substantiation of logical inconsistency.
How is that "substantial analysis"? By that logic, it would be substantial analysis to say "If A, then likely X. If B, then likely Y. If C, then likely Z." That's hypothetical postulation-
not analysis. Your confusion of the two, again, suggests that your Ti is perhaps not as adequate as you might want to believe.
My Ne is self-evidently very active indeed, and I would be the first to admit that it often operates faster than I can comfortably handle- but it is far from "grossly unchecked", thank you very much.
That said, I tire of this. Let us suppose indeed, that an ENFP utilizing weak Ti does resemble an ENTP, that a hypothetical scenario can be considered substantial analysis, and that my Ne is grossly unchecked. Have a nice day! :hi: