Orangey
Blah
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2008
- Messages
- 6,354
- MBTI Type
- ESTP
- Enneagram
- 6w5
Ummm...so in your OP you say
But you don't explain what these languages are, or why there would be such a divide. I have lots of N friends, and I don't overhear them talking to each other in some mystical language that is forbidden to my kind.
What does that even mean? Can you provide an example of S speak and N speak? Please tell me it's not "gee the sky is blue today" vs "blah blah blah metaphysics string theory existentialism blah blah"
So you're talking about conversational topics now, not "style" or "language".(?) Your interchanging use of non-synonymous words is confusing.
If I'm interpreting your ideas correctly (???????) I think your premise is incorrect (that sensors talk about only things they can immediately see and touch) so any theory based on that would be flawed. I also think you're making another flawed assumption: that sensors and intuitives start from vastly different places (relative to all the other differences that might exist between people: gender, race, age, class, etc etc etc). A third premise that makes no sense to me is that one person must "accommodate" the other, rather than it being a mutual effort towards understanding.
Yeah, exactly. It's like we're just supposed to assume that there's such a thing as "N speak" or "S speak."
Often it's just as hard to communicate with other intuitives.
Two people have to be on the same wavelength as far as subject matter. Often it's not function as much as focus.
+1000000
Sorry to be annoying but I am compelled to point out the irony of the above statements in relation to the subject being discussed.
Apologies, continue.
Fufufufu.