I analyze my feelings and already know most cause-and-effects that cause them inside my mind and experience. I also use my emotions to translate them into art. I figure it out rather fast, can analyze dreams quickly, and when I feel something I quickly know exactly why. In a few cases when I don't know right away then I do have to think about it for a while. I know my flaws and weaknesses also. I can fall into analysis loops when I know the cause-and-effect, but can't find a way out. In the cases I become overly-analytical there isn't a lot of new discovery, but more just a destructive negative loop the results from a lack of solution.
What does bother me is when people try to tell me to stop feeling, or show me that my emotion is absurd. I can already know it's absurd, but that doesn't make it stop anymore than knowing what caused my nausea can magically make it stop. When an emotion is absurd but persistent, it is because it has been triggered from an earlier experience for which it was a legitimate response. It's because some earlier damage is fired up in my mind, so even the absurd is absolutely real, but just out of context. Also, once the process of a really intense emotion starts, there is a physiological response that has to complete itself. It is absurd to think that can stop on a dime - like an anxiety attack. I can figure my own way out and don't like it when other people oversimplify it by just saying "stop", like that hasn't occurred to me or I wouldn't do that if it were an actual option. That is extremely patronizing.
I deal with emotional scars like someone missing a leg has to find ways to compensate to function as needed. I can't force myself to regrow a leg, but I can find ways to compensate and still get the job done, or I can decide something isn't worth the emotional trauma it will cause and not feel obligated just because someone else or society expects it of me.