so this goes back to the question of "is the whole a thing unto itself or a composite of it's parts?"
So how do we figure out if we have a part or a whole? We know not what we cannot see.
so this goes back to the question of "is the whole a thing unto itself or a composite of it's parts?"
How did Einstein find a solution to his practical problem when he was working in the patent office?So how do we figure out if we have a part or a whole? We know not what we cannot see.
I have to find a new MBTI ?This is interesting, however it seems like you forgot than
0 = ( ... ((192000 * (1+6.75/100/12)-x) * (1+6.75/100/12)-x) ... )
(expanding the products)
= 192000*(1+6.75/100/12)^(28*12) - (1+6.75/100/12)^(28*12-1)*x - (1+6.75/100/12)^(28*12-2)*x - ... - x
(simplifying with the Geometric Series formula)
= 192000*(1+6.75/100/12)^(28*12) - [(1+6.75/100/12)^(28*12)-1] / [(1+6.75/100/12)-1] * x
so
x = 192000 * (6.75/100/12) / [1-(1+6.75/100/12)^(-28*12)] = 1273.40
The total amount payed over the life of the loan is:
1273.40 * 12 * 28 = 427860.94
and
0 = (...((199000 * (1+2/100/12)-x) * (1+2/100/12)-x) * ... * (1+4.875/100/12)-x)
= 192000 * (1+2/100/12)^(12*5) * (1+3/100/12)^(12) * (1+4/100/12)^(12) * (1+4.875/100/12)^(12*23)
- x * [(1+2/100/12)^(12*5-1) * (1+3/100/12)^(12) * (1+4/100/12)^(12) * (1+4.875/100/12)^(12*23)
+ (1+2/100/12)^(12*5-2) * (1+3/100/12)^(12) * (1+4/100/12)^(12) * (1+4.875/100/12)^(12*23)
+ ... + 1]
So (getting lazy and using a spreadsheet - it could be done with 4 different geometric series, but that calculation is still large):
x = 913.18
and the total payments over the life of this loan total:
913.18 * 12 * 30 = 328744.80
Now you gotta restart everything
Okey ragashree and Zarathustra. I should have a Mac or a scanner.. but you can do it if you want. So take a pen, a paper and a ruler.Yes, please tell us, wildcat. I usually have no trouble understanding what you're doing, but you've lost me here!
Okey ragashree and Zarathustra. I should have a Mac or a scanner.. but you can do it if you want. So take a pen, a paper and a ruler.
Draw a square. 7 X 7 .. so that you have 49 equal compartments.
Send it over. Then I tell what to do with it.. or at least I try to.
I have to find a new MBTI ?
I cannot say. I have never used it. I am totally ignorant about the thing.Is it ok if I use excel?
(I feel like such a child...... I haven't felt like this in years...)
We have one chart.
6666666
6666666
6666666
6666666
6666666
6666666
6666666
Therefore what is above 6 is P.
We do not have many charts. This is a chameleon game.
6666666
6666666
6666666
6666666
6666666
6666666
6666666
=
12 11 10 09 08 07 06
11 10 09 08 07 06 05
10 09 08 07 06 05 04
09 08 07 06 05 04 03
08 07 06 05 04 03 02
07 06 05 04 03 02 01
06 05 04 04 02 01 00
What is above 6 is P. Think it as a map. Loci is a terrain.
12 is the axiom of P. It is like the King in the throne, in the back seat of Chess.
Forget the two blocks. It is only a theoretical number basis because we have 6(7 X 7) in the loci. This is the alternative I chose. You do not need to pay undue attention to it.To be honest, I'm kinda starting to get it...
At least the 0-12 part...
I don't quite get the first two blocks of 6s, though...
Forget the two blocks. It is only a theoretical number basis because we have 6(7 X 7) in the loci. This is the alternative I chose. You do not need to pay undue attention to it.
P = -J. Therefore what is below 6 is J. What is 6 is neither P or J.