Researcher
New member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2015
- Messages
- 86
- MBTI Type
- ENTP
- Enneagram
- bad
If you look back on our discussion, you will see that I never questioned what now in the above you pretend to be the whole of your argument. The point of contention is whether intending Ti inevitably shows Fe. You know, the big part of my last post you intentionally ignored. The wrong part.
I take it this retreat means you acknowledge your error.
I was a bit too quick maybe with my last reply.
But anyway, I can't go into what "saying hello" means obviously. (I am not going to guess the functions behind various situations, that is a derailment into an endless discussion.)
You did introduce something else were you say that you could not just misread Ti only as its polar opposite Fe, but also as all other functions (Te, Se). Well, with all the average confusion about the functions obviously. Thats just a practical problem anyway. Also another endless discussion.
I am just saying that in the ideal case were we would all be "ideal typologists, using the exact same map of functions, where we are not fighting about which function it is", then we still can't say 100% sure which side of the opposite the original intent was.
But you don't believe that anyway. Up to you what to believe.