Typology charts & visual data

[The Decline]

I'd like to see some type comparison charts, please. Who's got em? MBTI preferably, but whatever else too.

 

[nightning]

This explains a lot to me...

 

[Ozz]

So sensors and intuitives live in different dimension.

 

[Skyward]

So sensors and intuitives live in different dimension.

Yeah, a different mental dimension.

 

[NewEra]

This explains a lot to me...

How? It seems confusing to look at and doesn't seem to be ordered well.

 

[nightning]

It explains functional ordering...

and "degree of separation" between two types. The more paths you need to travel, the more different the way two types are.

 

[NewEra]

The more paths you need to travel, the more different the way two types are.

Oh I see what you're saying. Yeah, in that regard, it does make sense.

 

[JustHer]

This explains a lot to me...

HAH!

I was looking at this cube in the computer lab at school and somebody came up and said:

What is this ISTP molecule made of Titanium, Sellenium, Nickel, and Iron??!

 

[The Decline]

HAH!

I was looking at this cube in the computer lab at school and somebody came up and said:

What is this ISTP molecule made of Titanium, Sellenium, Nickel, and Iron??!

Also I really like this functional analysis cube. Any others that visualize functions? Hmm.. I wonder how we could draw up our own visuals..

 

[Eric B]

How? It seems confusing to look at and doesn't seem to be ordered well.

How about this one (includes both types of tesseract projection, and individual cubes):

For those who don't know; a tesseract is a four-dimensional version of a cube. So at each intersection, you have four lines meeting, which are supposed to all be at right angles. There also would be no cube inside a cube; in 4D it would be a solid convex object with all points, lines, etc. on the outside, like a cube in 3D. Hence, if we were in 4D, it would be the perfect way to align the types.
Since you're stepping down two dimensions to fit on a 2D screen, it's all distorted. Each axis (called X, Y, Z, W) maps to one of the dichotimies, and two types sharing a single line are close to each other, differing only by the letter the dimensional axis of that line represents.

 

[BlackCat]

I don't really understand how these shapes could help someone understand the theory...

 

[The Decline]

I don't really understand how these shapes could help someone understand the theory...

They've helped me. I'm a visual learner, and I've enjoyed having the advantage of easily seeing differences and similarities between types when they're plotted in front of me.

 

[BlackCat]

They've helped me. I'm a visual learner, and I've enjoyed having the advantage of easily seeing differences and similarities between types when they're plotted in front of me.

I meant specifically the 4D squares, I just don't see a use for them. All they do is have the types mapped out in a random pattern, but anyone who knows about type would see that pattern of the functions regardless...

 

[speculative]

I find this image to be informative. I am supposedly a probing healer who is an idealist. This wheel makes comparisons to other types quick & easy.

 

[wolfy]

What does probing mean in the image The Decline posted mean? Perceiving? Also that image has the title for ISFP and ESFP around the wrong way.

 

[NewEra]

ENFP is the champion, wtf? So every other type is a loser?

 

[wolfy]

ENFP is the champion, wtf? So every other type is a loser?

Champion as in someone who fights for a cause. To champion a cause. For example He championed the cause for ENFP as champion.

 

[Eric B]

What does probing mean in the image The Decline posted mean? Perceiving?

Yes. That the alternative name Keirsey came up with for P. And J is "scheduling" (or you can spell it "scheJuling"). Naturally, he would downplay "judging/perceiving" since he rejected the cognitive functions.

 

[Thalassa]

Hey these are cool thanks

Also, the diagrams in the OP help to convince me that I am an ENFP.

 

[Lady_X]

I don't really understand how these shapes could help someone understand the theory...

+1 was just thinking...wow you guys are weird.