#1) See thats a dedication that i cannot gaurentee to posess, and technology, while incredibly usefull, also develops things that are completely counter productive and usesless, but popular none the less, i have developed a distaste for irrelivant technology.
Well, maybe not "technology" per se.. more like, you should keep up with advances in the field to keep ahead.
2)Sounds awsome. I would love to mix the two, but as i stated before. I am starting college late and often wonder if their is a practicallity between what I want and what I can have. I dont want to walk into a career whith a bunch of people who are younger, possibly smarter, out ranking me on desireable jobs. I do consider that a desireable job.
I was enrolled in a co-op program, so I was able to get job experience in my field while I was going to school. Not only does something like that put you ahead of the curve in terms of experience, it also gives you a taste of what your degree is all about!
There were students of all ages in my undergrad classes, though the majority were around my age. Still, being young doesn't necessarily breed success. In fact, as someone who seems to be a bit older, you can bring maturity, clarity, and life understanding to the table where some of these young'ins can't

As long as you're not seeking employment at a "job shop" where it's basically
idea -> "factory" of mindless droning engineers -> product, you can probably find a unique niche. Engineering's great in that way, that if you want to be creative, there's a place for your unique experience.
3)LOL! I wonder if that sort of feeling is limited to the personality type.
4)Research and engineering sounds desireable. I don't want to be stuck under someone elses thumb, developing their ideas. Inevitably I want to either be on the fronteir of new discoveries and part of the solution, or completely spearheading the whole thing.
You know what? You're probably right. Engineers who don't have a problem with structure and want direction and rigid rules fare better than I do in such an environment. The acronyms, documents, procedures, bureaucracy, lack of flexibility, lack of control over the whole project, and being handed just a small piece of a much larger system.. just didn't appeal to me at all. An ISTJ would probably fare better than me (as perceiving myself as an ENTP) in such an environment.
Not to say that you can't do innovative research in an environment like that, but it isn't easy unless you work yourself into a high position with some authority. And even still, once you do, you probably won't be doing the research yourself.. you'll be managing others' research!
Yeah, that experience told me a
lot about my own personality.
5)This scares me as I can no longer afford to be "flighty"
Thank you for your post it has given me a lot to think about.
Nothing to be worried about. I'm just saying that the opportunity to switch is
there, not that you have to. I sure hope I can stay where I'm at for a long time because I like it and I've been able to both work with and influence the system to make things comfortable for myself.. but the moment I feel the need to change, I know that there's always another company that'd sure appreciate another engineer..
I hope all this helps.. feel free to shoot me any questions in private, or maybe out in the open here if they get others thinking
