New and Awesome Socionics Test

[that's not my name]

Comprehensive socionics test, would like opinions on accuracy.

Test beta - AIM | AIM

I don't think it's accurate to me, first of all, I am pretty sure I am not ILI, but beyond that, these results, especially in the more in depth analysis look more like LIE (which I actually could be). But enough about me, I want to know your results and what you think, even if its not the most accurate it has some cool analysis and comparison features in the results pages.

 

[Merced]

Uh... Are you going to link to the test?

 

[that's not my name]

Uh... Are you going to link to the test?

Oh fuck, I thought I did, my bad I'm tired AF today hold on.

It's linked.

 

[Rouskyrie]

Test beta - AIM | AIM

I don't think it's accurate to me, first of all, I am pretty sure I am not ILI, but beyond that, these results, especially in the more in depth analysis look more like LIE (which I actually could be). But enough about me, I want to know your results and what you think, even if its not the most accurate it has some cool analysis and comparison features in the results pages.

My result was EII (INFJ). Not unlike my usual test results. I like the test.

 

[Verona]

Some of the questions are very poorly translated. I got EII. I usually get that or IEI.

 

[that's not my name]

My result was EII (INFJ). Not unlike my usual test results. I like the test.

My main problem with the test is that according to my cognitive functions my Te (and Ti) are way higher than my Ni but because my dichotomy was ever so slightly introverted (and when I mean slightly I mean very slightly, basically even) I'm somehow ILI instead of LIE, if this is a true socionics test, then the cognitive functions would be much more important than the dichotomy, especially one that is so near center when the cognitive functions scores are not ambiguous in the slightest.

So I guess my question is, did your actual cognitive function scores match the type they assigned you?

 

[Rouskyrie]

My main problem with the test is that according to my cognitive functions my Te (and Ti) are way higher than my Ni but because my dichotomy was ever so slightly introverted (and when I mean slightly I mean very slightly, basically even) I'm somehow ILI instead of LIE, if this is a true socionics test, then the cognitive functions would be much more important than the dichotomy, especially one that is so near center when the cognitive functions scores are not ambiguous in the slightest.

So I guess my question is, did your actual cognitive function scores match the type they assigned you?

No, they didn't match up. The scoring indicated that my Fe was stronger than my Ni, however my Se was lower than Ti.

 

[Mayflower]

Hmm. SEE

 

[Verona]

My main problem with the test is that according to my cognitive functions my Te (and Ti) are way higher than my Ni but because my dichotomy was ever so slightly introverted (and when I mean slightly I mean very slightly, basically even) I'm somehow ILI instead of LIE, if this is a true socionics test, then the cognitive functions would be much more important than the dichotomy, especially one that is so near center when the cognitive functions scores are not ambiguous in the slightest.

So I guess my question is, did your actual cognitive function scores match the type they assigned you?

My Fi and Fe appeared to be tied as the highest functions. Se was the lowest.

 

[Merced]

I feel like this would be a better enneagram test than a socionics test. Also clearly from the test results I am on the Ne-Si axis. Why were my results EIE?

 

[á´…eparted]

I am not a fan of this test. I've taken it in the past and it gave me no useful pattern. Then again, I don't fit into a neat box in socionics so take that as you will.

 

[erg]

Test beta - AIM | AIM

EDIT: IF it ain't working on firefox, try with another browser

 

[Merced]

Broken link, yo

 

[erg]

Keep trying, I think they might have some bandwith problem. Here are my results (you need to make a screencap and upload it to post them):

 

[Merced]

Oh wait... someone made a thread about this test today already. Here's a link to it.

 

[Kierva]

Been a while since I got SLE... I'm actually okay being in Beta.

But IEIs as my dual? I hope I meet a healthier and better one, because the ones I've met are absolutely terrible to deal with.

 

[erg]

oh damn

 

[that's not my name]

oh damn

I'm cool with the mods combining my thread into this one since this is the proper section.

 

[Gone]

Leading type LII, followed by ILI, then ILE, then IEI... I don't know my socionics type so no idea if it's accurate.
Highly intuitive, highly introverted, medium irrational and peripheral, a little individualist and logical, and the rest is barely noticable, around zero.
Sounds okay I think. Even though I don't know what to make of most of the lower categories/dichotomies. Gonna read a lot today.


---- Update:

ILE-Ne. The description Socionics Types: ILE-ENTp Subtypes here by Meged and Ovcharov fits better than anything else I've ever read. Also the descriptions of the functions in their respective places. Nice. I can get behind that.

Back to the test... Well. Top 3 at least.

 

[hjgbujhghg]

LOL...this is even older than that. I posted a thread like this last year in December http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/online-personality-tests/80747-socionics-test.htmlunless this is a new version