In my experience, Ni-Creatives tend to be intimidating, powerful, and mysterious in appearance, which is highly attractive to me.
Is this a joke? The complexities of human pranks escape me.
Hmm....it's a 16-way tie between ESTJ, ISTJ, ESFJ, ISFJ, ESTP, ISTP, ESFP, ISFP, ENFJ, INFJ, ENFP, INFP, ENTJ, INTJ, ENTP, and INTP.
I don't you guys quite understand how to declare NTR.
MBTI determines the direction of your mental energy, your inclinations, the
Nature part of your personality. Your tastes, interests, the shirts you like to wear, the bands your grew up listening to, your economic level, race, are determined by your upbringing and circumstances, the
Nurture part of your personality.
NTR means that some hidden, undisclosed factor of your Nurture gives you tastes/preferences/tendencies that vastly differ from those defined by your Cognitive Functions. In a vacuum, ESTPs run fast, kill shit, and listen to Industrial Metal. If they grew up around people who were in a grunge band and something in their early development caused them to associate Grunge with Se or Ti, they'd probably grow up liking Grunge rock.
You could have an ugly Type X who's ugly because of a special exception in his Nurture, while other members of his type, or Nature, are attractive. But, in general, certain Functions
can be more inclined to make a person more or less attractive, at least in the context of his culture. In a vacuum, I say we assume we're talking about the context of whatever culture we're currently in -- it's the internet, there are a lot of different cultures here, but if there's any particular cultural caveats, we should certainly be pointing them out.
TL;DR: Stop rampantly declaring NTR on an MBTI-centered site. This is the reason why this place is dead.