greenfairy
philosopher wood nymph
- Joined
- May 25, 2012
- Messages
- 4,024
- MBTI Type
- iNfj
- Enneagram
- 6w5
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/sp
I could see Tom Riddle/Voldemort as more INTJ than ENTJ, personally. Probably an 8.
I've always seen Hermione as an INFJ.
Hermoine INFJ, similar to Lisa Simpson
Why don't people want to consider Hermione as an NT or NF?
NJ's are real sticklers for the rules too. .ya know..![]()
I agree with ISTJ for Hermione. She is much more of a "by the book" thinker than "outside the box", and saves the day by remembering useful information and doing her homework. Snape is certainly a TJ. INTJ most likely, but a decent case can be made for ISTJ. Regarding houses, I don't think any kind of rigorous correspondence can be made between houses and types/temperaments. There are too many ways to be NT, or SJ, or Slytherin, etc.I'm not sure about her feeling, but her thinking seems more extroverted than introverted, to me. Kind of a "'these are the facts" approach rather than a "this is how I"ve been able to make sense of it" approach.
I like Snape as an INTP. I always liked him way better than Harry, even when we were supposed to think he was a bad guy.
Regarding houses, I don't object to placing NTs in Slytherin as long as we get Ravenclaw, too, but I think SFPs belong in Slytherin as well. Slughorn seems a little SFP. Aren't they equally ambitious? (I'm going by the "ambition is most important" definition of Slytherin, not the "evil" definition of Slytherin.)
I've come to see Voldemort as INFJ. His strategising is really rather poor, and his ambitions come off as a huge moral crusade, more like Bin Laden.I could see Tom Riddle/Voldemort as more INTJ than ENTJ, personally. Probably an 8.
That may be. I think Light Yagami from Death Note is INFJ, and many think he's INTJ. The two are similar.I've come to see Voldemort as INFJ. His strategising is really rather poor, and his ambitions come off as a huge moral crusade, more like Bin Laden.
Since Voldemort is effectively a magical Hitler, the type community should agree with you.I've come to see Voldemort as INFJ. His strategising is really rather poor, and his ambitions come off as a huge moral crusade, more like Bin Laden.
I agree.IRT Hermione, I don't think looking at how closely she follows or deviates from rules is very telling. I know SJs who blow rules out of the water and NJs who are sticklers. It's much more about how they look at information - conceptual or pragmatic.
Hermione is a detail person. She is practically a walking encyclopedia of knowledge - terms, definitions, dates, places, all those little tidbits of information that allow her to snap things into place more quickly than the others. It's not that she's a big-picture intuitive thinker - she doesn't have a "vision" of what she's after, she doesn't spend time conceptualizing goals, or theorizing on topics, or lining information up to create a grand scheme. She collects bits of knowledge for the sake of collecting bits of knowledge, and she's excellent at filling in the gaps.
For this reason, I would type Hermione as an ISTJ.
I agree with @skylights and @Coriolis on why Hermione is SJ instead of NT. (Si and Te are definitely her most obvious functions.)
If Hermione is an ISTJ, I think the series shows her going from an ambiverted childhood to a more introverted adulthood. Part of why I always like to think of her as ESTJ (even if she isn't), is that her path to maturity is so much like the one I took, growing up: from being shamelessly bossy in childhood, to being more subdued and sensible as a young adult.
Maybe it's more because she and I are both obvious 1w2s -- and I think she's also so-first. (though likely so/sp?)
I really, really think she's so-first -- her focus is definitely the social realm and crises of groups (as opposed to self, or individuals) -- e.g. house elf rights, and that sort of thing. Each instinct of 1 is focused on perfecting some area of their life, and perfecting Society At Large seems to be what she's all about. Like you pointed out in your edit, that's why she's (generally) content breaking the rules, so long as it's For The Greater Good.
True, possible that she could be TeSi over SiTe. What's making you think so/sp? Not that I disagree - I just haven't thought about her variant much.
I really, really think she's so-first -- her focus is definitely the social realm and crises of groups (as opposed to self, or individuals) -- e.g. house elf rights, and that sort of thing. Each instinct of 1 is focused on perfecting some area of their life, and perfecting Society At Large seems to be what she's all about. Like you pointed out in your edit, that's why she's (generally) content breaking the rules, so long as it's For The Greater Good.
It's hard to distinguish self-pres, for STJs, because even self-pres last STJs understand (and prioritize) the need to take good care of themselves and their environment*. (Alhough with sx/so and so/sx, attention to self-pres is usually a means to an end.) Now that I've thought about it a bit more, I think she might also be so/sx -- because I see the blind spot as being more likely to be sp. She doesn't take care of herself very well, and she fits the sp-last "workaholic" stereotype. I think, for example, an so/sp Hermione would have been less likely to decide to use the time-turner the way she did.
Also -- again, now that I've thought about it more -- there's something I've noticed with sx-first and second, where you don't realize how closely those people are observing you until they give an observation that is Absolutely Spot On, a deep insight about who you are that they inferred from your shallower behavior. Hermione gives those tidbits to Ron and Harry, on a regular basis.
*That's probably the main reason why I mistyped as so/sp for such a long time.
Ginny was a forceful, independent girl who often knew her own mind. She had an energetic, lively personality; having a huge crush on Harry, however, during the first few years of their friendship, she became shy and withdrawn in his presence [...]
Ginny was not afraid to stand up to anybody, friends and enemies alike [...] she could be harsh towards those whom she disliked [...] Her brothers [...] thought that she was too popular for her own good. She was also known to be quick-witted and funny and could often make others laugh even when they were feeling down.
Ginny also had a knack for imitating the mannerisms of others very accurately, much to the amusement of those around her [...] Ginny was also good at lying and capable of being opaque when necessary. [...]
This...Harry Potter is probably a simple-minded and bossy ESTJ with no connection to the magical realms of personality or imagination whatsoever. All hail the almighty supervisor, the true lord of wizards. One day however Darth Raptor will take his place as the Legendary Dragon Archmage!