Il Morto Che Parla
New member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2012
- Messages
- 1,260
- MBTI Type
- xxTP
Like I said about pushing people out of their comfort zone earlier.. anyone can commit to unlikely activities, if necessary. MBTI was designed to only describe types as Preferences. Myers was appalled when she saw companies firing people for their test results. It wasn't meant to describe people in their totality.
I know that more than anyone, as my whole attitude is to concentrate on my area of weakness.
However, if you were forced to live and work in a world where N- functions were the most valued, yes you'd adapt. BUT you'd be one of the "worst" people, as you'd still be going against your instict every day.
Like speaking in a foreign language. People adapt, but will always be disadvantaged against a natural*.
Likewise, if an N was forced into a situation where S- functions were the most valued, yes they would adapt, but would constantly be one of the idiots of the group. Sure they survive, but as a loser.
So in that case, my quesiton is simple, and no-one wants to answer it.
In barbaric societies such as those I stated, were N's losers/wierdos? Or did people simply not develop as N-doms or N-aux?
*assuming equal intelligence/ability.