dude... don't make me explain this to you A... after all, I'm a dumb (and buzzed) Sensor
You never have a dominant or auxillary Si in any P type, just as you never have a dominant or auxilary Ni in any P... the introverted perceiving functions are associated with judging just as the extroverted perceiving functions are a hallmark of a P type.... generally speaking, according to some theories, it's easier to develop some of our shadow functions than it is to develop our tertiary or inferior functions (note my extra special Ne and Te, for example...)
Therefore, that someone wouldn't have as well developed of a tertiary or inferior as they would some of their shadow functions isn't all so shocking
Tougher life experiences that cause a person to function in their shadow more often, for instance, could assist in the development of one's shadow functions, for instance, as they wouldn't do for the tertiary or inferior
In otherwords, it would be almost more accurate, theoretically, for some to develop more in the order of 12567834 or so instead of the traditional linear manner or so...
or you could look up some of wildcats old threads on type theory puzzles for fun... that's always a fun Ne exercize... if you're up for the challenge![]()
I'm sure... it smells strongly of bloody marys![]()
extraverted Sensing (Se) ***************************** (29.1)
average use
introverted Sensing (Si) ******* (7)
unused
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) *************************************** (39.6)
excellent use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ************************************ (36.4)
excellent use
extraverted Thinking (Te) ************************************ (36.5)
excellent use
introverted Thinking (Ti) ****************************** (30.3)
good use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) *********************** (23.9)
limited use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ************************************* (37.4)
excellent use
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: ENFP
Lead (Dominant) Process
Extraverted Intuiting (Ne): Exploring the emerging patterns. Wondering about patterns of interaction across various situations. Checking what hypotheses and meanings fit best. Trusting what emerges as you shift a situation’s dynamics.
Support (Auxilliary) Process
Introverted Feeling (Fi): Staying true to who you really are. Paying close attention to your personal identity, values and beliefs. Checking with your conscience. Choosing behavior congruent with what is important to you.
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: INFP, or ENTJ
What's odd about this?Hey, can someone help me identify a friend? His results were:
extraverted Sensing (Se) ************************** (26.1)
average use
introverted Sensing (Si) ******************************* (31.1)
good use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ****************************************** (42.1)
excellent use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ************************** (26.5)
average use
extraverted Thinking (Te) ****************************** (30.8)
good use
introverted Thinking (Ti) ********************************** (34.3)
good use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ********************* (21.8)
limited use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ************************** (26.9)
average use
Yeah...some odd results.
What's odd about this?You'reYour friend is quite obviously ENTP.
Hey, can someone help me identify a friend? His results were:
extraverted Sensing (Se) ************************** (26.1)
average use
introverted Sensing (Si) ******************************* (31.1)
good use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ****************************************** (42.1)
excellent use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ************************** (26.5)
average use
extraverted Thinking (Te) ****************************** (30.8)
good use
introverted Thinking (Ti) ********************************** (34.3)
good use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ********************* (21.8)
limited use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ************************** (26.9)
average use
Yeah...some odd results.
important belief is logical consistency43. Continually examine if choices harmonize with important beliefs.
Evaluating what is worth believing in seems oddly similar to science as a whole.36. Evaluate what is worth believing in and most important to who you really are inside.
logical consistency, yet again.25. Always remain true to what you want for yourself or others.
Wondering what causes people to say no to this. Simply not knowing what will make you happy won't cause a no response.19. Freely enjoy doing what you want for your own personal happiness.
logical consistency, again.13. Remain in touch with what you want for yourself, what motivates you, and what is good.
Good and bad are subjective to the point this can be made true for every single person who has ever made a decision.8. Feel strongly that something is good or bad.
A number of things could cause it. You could feel bound by duty, or to what makes others happy, or simply not feel deserving of happiness.Wondering what causes people to say no to this. Simply not knowing what will make you happy won't cause a no response.
True, but this points to ESFP rather than ESFJ. See how much higher your Se is than your Si?Least i know i am an SF
extraverted Sensing (Se) ****************************************** (42)
excellent use
introverted Sensing (Si) *************************** (27.5)
average use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ********************* (21.6)
limited use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ************************** (26.5)
average use
extraverted Thinking (Te) **************************** (28.5)
average use
introverted Thinking (Ti) *************************** (27.6)
average use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ******************************** (32.5)
good use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ********************************** (34)
good use