Intjs seem a lot more tense in body language, tend to think of things in more yes/no terms, intjs tend to come across as more "stereotypical male" imo, intjs tend to liken themselves to historical figures more in a positive sense and tend to be more demanding/perfectionistic which can be awesome if done right
INTPs are more easygoing. INTJs are more srs bsns.
When trying to explain something, INTPs attempt to cover everything, from the basic to the exceptions of the exceptions. INTJs will just tell you what they judge necessary . Most people prefer the latter. It doesn't help that the INTP way of explaining things from the basics can make it seem like we think the other person is stupid.
INTPs are more flaky/lazy/disorganized. More flexible though. Convincing an INTJ that he/she is wrong is usually a hard task - but it helps if this person thinks you're intelligent.
I will skip the ''these are stereotypes yada yada'' talk and just tell what I've noticed:
INTPs are more easygoing. INTJs are more srs bsns.
When trying to explain something, INTPs attempt to cover everything, from the basic to the exceptions of the exceptions. INTJs will just tell you what they judge necessary . Most people prefer the latter. It doesn't help that the INTP way of explaining things from the basics can make it seem like we think the other person is stupid.
INTPs are more flaky/lazy/disorganized. More flexible though. Convincing an INTJ that he/she is wrong is usually a hard task - but it helps if this person thinks you're intelligent.
Actually Light Yagami is not a very good example. Light Yagami is always faking an F in the show, which is what most INTJs are horrible at/
You can sometimes tell by asking their opinion of something. INTJ is more likely to have an opinion, to answer by stating it in a concise way, followed up by some top-level reasoning, which they will then expand if asked or challenged. INTP is more likely to speak more generally on the topic, listing different perspectives, pros and cons, without ever saying what they personally believe. My INTP claims not to have opinions on many topics, due to incomplete knowledge of the topic. I usually do have an opinion, which (due to the incomplete knowledge), I will revise as I learn more.
This isn't foolproof, though. I have known a couple of INTPs who come off as quite opinionated.
Actually, Light is the protagonist.Light Yagami - INTJ (The Antagonist)
L Lawliet - INTP (The Protagonist)
Actually, Light is the protagonist.
INTPs seem to have stronger convictions about what's right and wrong intrinsically (not morally, though)...they seem to have strong opinions about what they appreciate and don't appreciate (maybe that's some Fe leaking through)...crudely constructed things, especially when carrying a whiff of Se/Fe/Si (I'm thinking mass-oriented popular music for example) may get rejected violently (in this scenario the INTP often fails to engage with the object on the object's terms, which is a fate INTJs also seem to suffer at the hands of INTPs). Matters of taste are not the realm of the dominant perceiver IME.
Whether he is the pro- or the antagonist has nothing to do with whether or not he is a villain.Nico, this is why INTJs are the perfect villains.
They don't know they are the villains.
Whether he is the pro- or the antagonist has nothing to do with whether or not he is a villain.
To think about 'Death Note' in terms of good guy/bad guy also makes little sense to me.
Ti is pretty useless when it works with poor definitions.He is not the villain but still is the antagonist of the story.
So in that sense you are still wrong, dear INTJ.
Ti > INTJ
Ti is pretty useless when it works with poor definitions.