Where was his imagination? He was just describing what he did as a child, he was looking for something that was actually there, the faint signal coming through of a concrete reality (real tv show) and he wondered what actual real concrete TV show it was. A faint indication of a hidden concrete reality feeds Se, you want to take in more and more detail to reveal what's really there, to ground yourself. As a child I used to stare at the TV "snow" and pretend they were a swarm of ants, and I kept waiting for one of them to do something special, then I would know that one was the "Atom" ant, that argueably takes more imagination than what Spielberg was doing. Should that be telling me something?
He then went on to describe an act of extreme impulsiveness, SPs are known for their impulsiveness, no forethought, no reasoning, no meaning just pure (re)action.
I'm not wanting to start another debate, I'm just trying to see why I don't find Spielbergs 'pattern' all that remarkable. If I'm ISFP my pattern should be quite different shouldn't it? and I should find what he is saying as 'out there'?
Confused.