tcda
psicobolche
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2009
- Messages
- 1,292
- MBTI Type
- intp
- Enneagram
- 5
Seems to me that a lot of the descriptions of iNtuition are essentially mystical.
You can't have pure "abstractions". Every abstraction in the last instance flows from a generalization and simplification of material "phenomena" in order to permit a generalized discussion. Consciousness is the result of material building blocks - the human body - and a material process - evolution.
So iNtution shouldn't be seen as divorced from the material world, but as a particular form of percieving it. Nothing more. It is not a mytic force, rather ti means you subconsciously store and group data and then express it as a generalized vision. Because it is based on eradication of detail in order to permit generalization, it doesn't reference the specific, and often cannot do so easily (needing to seek out Si or Se).
We all do this to a greater or lesser degree but to some it's the primary way of collecting information, to some it is secodnary to reference to the specific.
Any thoughts? Apologies if I am reinventing the wheel here but sometimes I think iNtuition, because of its nature, is treated as something immaterial, inexplicable and "mystical". Which is completely wrong.
You can't have pure "abstractions". Every abstraction in the last instance flows from a generalization and simplification of material "phenomena" in order to permit a generalized discussion. Consciousness is the result of material building blocks - the human body - and a material process - evolution.
So iNtution shouldn't be seen as divorced from the material world, but as a particular form of percieving it. Nothing more. It is not a mytic force, rather ti means you subconsciously store and group data and then express it as a generalized vision. Because it is based on eradication of detail in order to permit generalization, it doesn't reference the specific, and often cannot do so easily (needing to seek out Si or Se).
We all do this to a greater or lesser degree but to some it's the primary way of collecting information, to some it is secodnary to reference to the specific.
Any thoughts? Apologies if I am reinventing the wheel here but sometimes I think iNtuition, because of its nature, is treated as something immaterial, inexplicable and "mystical". Which is completely wrong.