Right. And since I'm such a horrible failure at being objective with Ti, I'm asking someone else to do this.
to whom it may concern,
why is it that you profess such a high level of objectivity, yet fail to achieve your alleged caliber in every category? you state your positions as though you've touched the holy grail of truth, but in reality, your assertions are merely hypotheses in the process of testing. you declare your stance so matter-of-factly, but your method of reasoning is simply a sandbox of fraudulence. it is in this sandbox that you dick around like a child, while everybody else grows increasingly frustrated with your duplicity and carelessness. for all the time it takes you to develop an informed conclusion, your thoughts amount to gross over-simplifications in the face of an ocean of empirical data. if the situation wasn't already dire enough, you attest that you have a monopoly on openness, when your stubbornness indicates that you wouldn't know a novel idea if it bit you on the face. to top it all off, despite your 'detachment', you shit the bed every time your pet theories are challenged. emotionally compromised, but unaware, your repressed feelings rise to the surface, embarrassing almost everyone involved. but not you, because you have no idea how ridiculous you look.