R
ReflecTcelfeR
Guest
I view it more as the reason why we speak is emotion (the opinion) and from there we use whatever knowledge we have to support that emotion. In essence the reason why we speak is emotion and the reason why we debate what we speak is logic. It seems like a process to me. Of course in logic emotion is weaved in, but that I think (as I'm sure we all do) is impossible to avoid. Common sense?