INTJ123
HAHHAHHAH!
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2009
- Messages
- 777
- MBTI Type
- ESFP
And yet this thread does not reflect that awareness. At all.
How about working on your interpersonal intelligence then? Keep the rudeness to a minimum please.
And yet this thread does not reflect that awareness. At all.
And yet this thread does not reflect that awareness in any coherent way.
How about working on your interpersonal intelligence then? Keep the rudeness to a minimum please.
hmm interesting, never heard that before, will have to look into it.
There will be an optimum IQ for highest income earners, which is likely to be above average but not super bright.
Sorry it's not a thing it s principal, so not really worth looking up. Intellengce stops being a factors across the income scale once it gets beyond a certain point. Then it's qualities like leadership, inlfuence, etc.
Intellegence helps with the technical pocess of working it doesn't nessesarily help with office politics...
Physcial appearance comes into it
Do you follow me?
Lis
Well, I don't believe this is necessarily true. The marginal increase probably dies out asymptotically, but I don't think that the curve Wealth= f(IQ) is parabolic, more likely some type of logarithmic relationship. As an out-of-reference citation, Bill Gates is supposed to have an IQ of around 170 on the basis of his SAT scores, yet this doesn't seem to have impeded his success much (and since people with 170 as IQ are such a low number, even one occurrence in the top-3 earners of the world is statistically significant).
Maybe, but I'm sure I've seen research that says it does but I can't find the link. It's curves the same as the wealth article..,,,
this is on wiki but I've definately seen a research article....
Income
Some researchers claim that "in economic terms it appears that the IQ score measures something with decreasing marginal value. It is important to have enough of it, but having lots and lots does not buy you that much."[73][74]
Other studies show that ability and performance for jobs are linearly related, such that at all IQ levels, an increase in IQ translates into a concomitant increase in performance.[75] Charles Murray, coauthor of The Bell Curve, found that IQ has a substantial effect on income independently of family background.[76]
Intelligence quotient - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Taking the above two principles together, very high IQ produces very high job performance, but no greater income than slightly high IQ (and some studies show that very high IQ produces somewhat lower income than slightly high IQ
Alternatively, the confidence interval could widen with increasing IQ; not that it becomes less valuable on average (in the sense that Bill Gates and I are billionaires on average), but that it becomes chancier for the individual.
Yeah, that's what I mean, the marginal effect dies out asymptotically. I still don't think that it makes much sense to say that very high produces lower income, also because the study will very likely contain a small sample of people with very high (let's say above 160?) IQ, unless it was done worldwide...
I've been having similar urges to become a farmer, as silly as it sounds to some.
On the other hand, isn't it curious how seemingly stupid people get high power positions?
(You know depression lowers one's IQ results).
I've heard over 75% of mensa members work blue collar jobs.
No not silly. I have the same urges and my family looks at me like From what I have been reading, there is a growing surge in this all over the country and there are many mentoring programs out there to learn the art as well as agriculture programs through university extensions and loans expressly for purchasing land/equipment for new farmers. Look into it.