Look at all them ties. A two-way tie for first. A three-way tie for fourth place.
Ne (Extroverted Intuition) (85%)
Ni (Introverted Intuition) (85%)
Fe (Extroverted Feeling) (75%)
Te (Extroverted Thinking) (65%)
Ti (Introverted Thinking) (65%)
Fi (Introverted Feeling) (65%)
based on your results your type is likely - infj
I see an overall picture of flexibility when I look at those numbers. And mine:
Te (Extroverted Thinking) (80%)
your valuation of / adherence to logic of external systems / hierarchies / methods
Ti (Introverted Thinking) (85%)
your valuation of / adherence to your own internally devised logic/rational
Ne (Extroverted Intuition) (85%)
your valuation of / tendency towards free association and creating with external stimuli
Ni (Introverted Intuition) (95%)
your valuation of / tendency towards internal/original free association and creativity
With scores that close, to make any qualitative claims based on such small quantitative differences is pointless. Now, if Ni = 95 and Ne = 65, it might get my attention. But it doesn't. The same applies to Te and Ti. I look for an overall picture, not which one is higher than another (by a small percentage) and somehow find that significant. Those percentages could easily change on a retake, not to mention - some of the questions on that test were pure crap. Whether or not someone likes money has nothing to do with a function-attitude. The bottom line is: that so-called test isn't really measuring what it claims.