the sentinel
New member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2023
- Messages
- 22
- Enneagram
- 5
Last edited by a moderator:
i am aware my new model is not particularly sound as it is. for now its only a working prototype. But i will also say i do not like riso and hudson's model. The health levels make sense given each type. But I find that the way the types behave is not really like "real people". so that would mean the health levels are off too. it's not their system thats really off, its just the information they're working with. because the types themselves are off, that also means the triads would be off too. the reason i have so much animosity towards the current model is directly because of the "caricatures" that each type makes people seem; because the entire system is built off the personalities, then everything after it has to be changed as well.What interested me the most was your new triads. You stated The Enneagram is an ancient symbol that nobody knows where came from. It was popularised in the 1970s or so by Oscar Ichazo, who taught of nine different ego types. (ego = someone's conscious thoughts and desires.) Each type has a different motivation, fear, and vice. The goal of learning which type you belong to is to help you know more about yourself and grow as a person.
(ego = someone's conscious thoughts and desires.)
These are the new triads:
1, 2, and 3 are head types:
4, 5, and 6 are gut types:
- 1 retreats to the mind to assess their motivation to exist as they do
- 2 plans out how to be the most useful to others
- 3 is cognizant how to get ahead and stay ahead
7, 8, and 9 are heart types:
- 4 trusts their gut to know what is and isn't them
- 5 uses gut information to quickly assess the environment
- 6 desires to connect with others on an intuitive level
- 7 wants to create a happy, utopian environment
- 8 wants to right wrongs and serve justice
- 9 want their environment to be in order and at peace, their emotional desires play out in fantasy
I am not shore what I think But I knotted that there was a pattern between points 1,2,3 and 4,5,6 and 7,8,9 It was quite some time ago 20 years ago so it is hard to recall my thoughts I would have to recall my understands at that point of time. I would not reject the triads of 2,3,4 and 5,6,7 and 8,9,1 because the mechanic is correct. The triads link the heart and head and gut with other structures correctly.
You are having a go at building a model that resonates with your own lens and understandings.
I don't want to say anything negative if you tried to reinvent the wheel your wheel seems a bit wonky and I don't your new model is as good as Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson's comprehensive model of the working enneagram.
I think the biggest problem with your model as it is, is that it doesn't seem to cater for the differing levels of health. It seems fixated at the level of overcompensation and that dose not descried the hole of the normal everyday operation the human mind.
I am still working on how to address the health levels more comprehensively. But getting 9 different levels is not possible with the research i have at hand. For now, I am trying to give each type a basic healthy v. unhealthy level. With the type descriptions themselves assuming average health.
being honest, i dont fully understand what this part means (but i will try to interpet it). i see that you have mentioned the heart and the mind ad two different stages that go back and forth. but i at a loss where that fits into the traditional model or even the "new" model. Where does that leave gut types?Have learned to stich on your heart and if so have you drafted this model via that focus of attention?
i am short on time so i cannot give a particuarly thoughtful response. But i think that the left-brain right-brain dynamic is more suited for Jungian functions than Enneagram. There may be a relationship, but i think it is not a really strong one. perhaps it might be part of the "1-5-9" schism; where 5 in their avarice represent the juggling between one side and the other. i would have to guess that every other type uses one over the other perferably, perhaps alterinating like chocolate drizzle (i. e. 9 is left, 1 is right, 8 is right, 2 is left) but at the moment i do not know each type's preference. maybe it could even be linked to a stress/growth points? like the translation of numbers, except via the mode of decision. (gut type disintegrates to head, integrates to heart for example)I meant switch on your heart Have you learned to switch on your heart.
Do you wake up in the morning sit on the edge of your bed and conches Ly focus your mental attention to your heart and switch, feel the switch of attention begin to lead from your heart and feel the mental of your mind is auxiliary to the hearts lead.
The law of three imaged is to sense think and feel simultaneously without bias. This is another way to switch on switch on intuitions of a spiritual order. Something one you do on the go one you can do when becoming conches after sleep in that first few minutes when waking up.
The point of my question was to work out if you were switching on your heart and then observing people for your new model.
I was thinking your new model maybe capturing the heart lead attention 1,2,3 Head, 4,5,6 Gut, 7,8,9 Heart.
I am also thinking when habitual direct cognition levels out cognition to a relaxed stable pattern what may have been referred to as be right brain thinking vs left brain thinking,. maybe your model 1,2,3 Head, 4,5,6 Gut, 7,8,9 Heart is the right brain modality and 2,3,4 Heart, 5,6,7 Head, 8,9,1 Gut is the left brain modality if modality is the best word.
So you may have found the missing puzzle peace.
I will give you an example.
I learnt to switch on my heart when I awoke every morning at the age of ten. I did this for two and a bit years and I began to not practice switching on my heart and slowly lost the use of my abilities. If authentic warranted I could switch on but I put my faith into fitting in and developing my cool personality as a new teen.
But I was always a right brain orientated person. But the enneagram dose not address left and right brain and I am thinking that you may have unwittingly found the mechanism in verdantly.
Before typed this I watched YouTube and drafted a flippant comment for fun and to point out how politically correct acting people have lost touch within the real world.
Lagoon 450 attacked by orcas
I am a nine with one, Sx/sp.
- 9 want their environment to be in order and at peace, their emotional desires play out in fantasy
My comment.
I would have had a powerful speargun on the boat. I would have shot one of the Orcas in the eye and reloaded my speargun with another spear. You could have tied the spear to a winch and dragged the Orcas along until the spear pulled out of the eye socket. Re using that spear to shoot another Killer whale. An electric chain saw could have also been helpful I noted an Orca was right in reach at the stern of boat. A good slash with the chain saw would have filled the water with blood. Next time have some Dynamite, that will let them know who has the technical edge. If I was to build a boat, I would have Gatland gun front and rear. The Gatland gun will turn any Orca into sushi in no time and let other Orcas and hippy boat owners know who is boss. Happy sails and always be prepared.
After writing this comment I thought about your model and realised have I actualised what he meaning you your model states at the Triad level of minds operation?
1,2,3 Head, 4,5,6 Gut, 7,8,9 Heart
Heart as a right brain thinker would be engaged Being a type nine.
All prose cesses begin at zero at point nine and end at nine at point nine. So, Head 1,2,3 being lead by a mental cognitive approach as a automatic response seams a right brain action.
4,5,6 Gut, draft it so it so it has an affects on the personal of the reader, seems a right brain action.
7,8,9 Heart, Taking part in what is real the narrative as a role play engaged within as a participant. 7,8,9 Heart.
Were as left brain people have more controlled ways to react and respond it is more about being considered, Process though filters first then respond. Auto response is fine if it has already been properly considered or the response or reaction is an accepted response or reaction. A Left brain approved norm approved by left brain first people..
So what do you think about that?
I did not chose to comment on you being a five and other stuff I wanted to focus on the two triads models and work out the possible mechanics. I think we may both be right brain first people and I think your triad model may tern out to be an important real component.
Remember left brain people insist on controlling the standard model because it is easier to manage all decisions and bias. And that is probably a good thing.
The real would for people is like a congenial trance role played we do what we believe we are meant to do just like those people in the boat. They sat back and hoped for the best.
The problem is if we think only though the left brain bias first we may loose contact with the valuable that the right brain has to offer, we may have lost in or bias the knowledge of its switching mechanism in the mind of man. We may have failed to recognise its place on the enneagram because we think right brain is a remedial like assert, something to be managed and not celebrated or promoted.