Ill reorganize like this:
Test 1:
High: Fi-Ni-Si
Middle 1:Te-Ti-Ne
Low: Fe-Se
Fi > Si > Ni > Ne = Te = Ti > Fe > Se
Test 2:
High: Si-Fi-Ti
Middle 1: Fe-Se
Middle 2: Ne-Ni
Low: Te
Si > Fi = Ti > Fe = Se > Ne > Ni > Te
Assembling:
Always high: Si-Fi
Always Middle: Ne
Always low: None
Uncertain position: Te-Se-Ni-Fe
The dominant functions (always high) is always introverted, and the recessive functions (always low) are always extroverted, so you got to be introverted.
Types with Fi and Si in their first 3 cognitive functions at functions stack:
INFP - Fi>Ne>Si
ISTJ - Si>Te>Fi
I tried to compare other functions, but, besides Fi and Si, all other functions functions seems to be moving and dancing all along, so all I get surely is that you have high Fi and high Si, but the big question is: What is your prefered extroverted function? I dont think you can answer yourself, but the key to this problem is to understand your communication style and how you communicate. If we stop to analise only the extraverted functions we get:
Test 1: Ne=Te>Fe>Se
Test 2: Fe=Se>Ne>Te
Its so different between test and thats the source of the confusion.
Wow! This is an incredible method and an interesting way of organizing the information gained from the tests. Thank you so much for letting me know your thought processes. I think the way both tests are structured lead it to be different because the TypoC one leads me to change the answers by using comparison. Dichotomy wise it would go ahead and change again depending on mood, which is why I posted these. I also think test 2 defines Fe differently from Test 1.
Onto the questions:
1) Had you done tests like these in the past? If yes, how did they looked like? Absolutely. I almost always get INTP, actually. Dichotomy testing has also varied a lot depending on my mood; i.e. more recently I started getting INFP and ISTJ, as well as ISTP. Functions on the other hand tend to be a bit less volatile within the past couple of years or so.
2) Things change in which way in terms of your freedom? Do you feel more limited or more free now? In comparison with the past? I feel more limited now. Not sure how I feel about that.
3) Are you exercising or experiencing something now that demands you to be more rational (like starting to get a math or engineering degree) or to be more sentimental? I'm experiencing something that demands me to be more sentimental, but I have to get started on my thesis (history). I think it is rational, but the methodology seems to utilise Te rather than Ti; i.e. the research fundamentally depends on existing professional opinions, studies tend to require solid facts to back them up, etc. What has always confused me was whether Ti could be supplemented by Se to reach a result similar to Te, hence my prior ISTP typing.
4) This is a little bit difficult, but how do you communicate and what is your comunication style? Maybe I should try searching your posts lol. A little too concise, I reckon. I tend to be more rational and down-to-earth. A lot of speculation regarding who's doing what, celebrities or not, tend to get shut down with no response, or just a short noncommital "uhuh". My posts tend to be short, as well. I'm unsure how the quality of communication comes across as. I suppose it sounds a bit harsher than I would like it to be.
5) Do you like structured enviroments? Or prefer a more independent enviroment? Independence often results in procrastination, but I prefer independence and no commitment. Unfortunate fact of life is there's always commitment. I
need a structured environment to complete my commitments... But I like freedom, or at least the idea of it. I do greatly dislike micromanagers however; it's very unproductive and lowers morale.
6) How do you help people when help is needed? When someone is depressed because of a problem for example. I try to help by just listening and then making them feel validated and not judged, like in therapy.Not that I'm trained, it's just that all the books I read on making connections require a good listener. Unfortunately I think those books aren't very good.
7) Would you prefer a stable and reliable life or a life more opened to surprises (suppose that none of these surprises are a complete disaster that ruins your entire life, but some should be bad)?
I think that's a huge problem because I don't have lots of happy surprises. Just unhappy ones. Keeping this in mind, stable. But let's say I don't have such bad experiences. Then I would like surprises, change in routine, looking at new things, etc.
8) Do you practice more convergent or divergent thinking or none? These images helps clarify:
I think I practise convergent thinking more, but I'm not sure. I generally start by looking at the goals, the required information (premise) needed to accomplish the task, generate one (one) solution, measure that solution (i.e. how well it fits the task), and then focus on that. I then ask whoever is in charge if this plan would work, then focus on it, or go back to step one. But during the process of executing the solution I sometimes stray a lot and follow the ideas that come up divergently, resulting in a need to start over again. Usually I also get feelings of insights, but not as good as Ni doms.
I have trouble discerning between Ne, Te and Ti, so I have serious doubts on my own typing.
