Truity
(INTX? How do you guys get the results? All I've got is the below and a request to pay 29 bucks.)
You love ideas, theories, and complex concepts
You analyze things logically and objectively
You are independent, unconventional, and do not care what others think
You think like a scientist and question everything
You have little patience for people who are intellectually inferior
TypoC
INFP
Fi>Ni>Ne>Te=Ti>Si>Se>Fe
I can evaluate you but without the numbers things gets a little bit more limited, more subjective and more complicated (and more prone to mistakes), and without the numbers I cant really generate the text (for example, there is a big difference if the last Fe is -5 or -10 for example, or if Fi is 7-8 and Ni 4 or just Fi=5 and Ni=4). Im going to do it by the way. Ah! Truity charges for the specific analyisis thats even goes beyond MBTI, but for the 4-letter codes with the % they just dont. But I cant really tell what happenned to you, if you try again you could try 16P. And I also dont need their description (the ideia is actually that I have one of my own instead). But your function stack remembers mine (Ne=Fi>Ni=Te>Ti>Se>Fe>Si) although I am testing if having a preference for Ti over Te is better for me.
I-E
Fi+Ni+Ti+Si>Ne+Te+Se+Fe
Preference for introversion, matches truity.
N-S
Ni+Ne>>Si+Se
Clear preference for intuition, truity should have a high number in % for intuition (matches truity).
F-T
Fi+Fe=Te+Ti
No preference, ambivalence. Im not quite sure if it equals but it should be close. Truity should had gave you something like 50-55% for thinking.
J-P
Easier using the stack, but this part is quite compromised without the numbers
P>J>P>J=P>J>P>J
I can remove where different equals, so:
P>J>P>J>P>J
There is a slightly preference for Perceveing, but it should be close to ambivalence. Doesnt matches truity but I can call an error because the numbers could change the results to slightly preference for Judging.
In the method terms, the results are INXX, part of the 2Xs could come from the lack of numbers, but I am going to continue and then force a pick up.
Fi vs Fe
Extreme preference for Fi over Fe (I am either). In cognitive function stacking (Grant Cognitive Function Stack, GFS) (INTJ=Ni Te Fi Se and etc), matches for INFP, INTJ, INTP, and it doesnt match for INFJ. In my own method, preference for Fi over Fe is expected in INFP and INTP (and nothing can be said in this matter to INFJ and INTJ).
Ti vs Te
No clear preference
Ne vs Ni
Slightly preference for Ni or no preference. Without the numbers, it could be very close to equal (like a difference of 1), or a difference of 2-3.
Se vs Si
The same for Ne vs Ni analysis
I can tell you, I think next time Ill not do the analysis without the numbers. Its INXX for sure, but forcing a pick, I would say INTP, with some INFP, INFJ and INTJ characteristics (3 other types on the mix is happening partially because of the numbers absence).
[MENTION=29921]awbro[/MENTION]
You are welcome! Time to handle a difficult case (and longer as I promised)!
I-E
Fi+Si+Ti+Ni>Fe+Se+Te+Ne
Slightly preference for introversion. Partially matches truity, for truity the introversion is clearer.
S-N
Se+Si>Ne+Ni
Slightly preference for sensing.
Method error, it doesnt match truity, althogh I think that if you had done TypoC test, the typoC test would go for intuition.
T-F
Te+Ti>Fe+Fi
Clear preference for thinking. Matches truity.
P-J
Si+Ni+Te+Fe>Se+Ne+Fi+Ti
Clear preference for judging. Truity goes undecided, but this decides for truity.
I looked for your posts in the pasts, to try to track changes. I did this because I promised to be a little bit more detailed to you because I had "promised" you more tha a month ago a different description.
30-06-2019 (highlander)
Si > Te = Ti > Se > Ni = Fi = Ne > Fe
Quick analysis using this method (no 4-letter code only test to verify): ISTX
03-07-2019 (nardi)
Si = Fi > Te = Ti > Ne > Se > Ni > Fe
Quick analysis using this method (no 4-letter code only test to verify): ISTP
Today (nardi)
Si = Te > Ne > Fi > Ti = Ni > Se > Fe
ISTJ
This Fi oscilation is quite strange. Si is always the first one, Fe is always the last one, Te is an stable auxiliary or tertiary, the other oscilates a little but not as much as Fi. Interestingly complicated. Changes a lot.
But coming back to the method, today the results are IXTJ, the X comes from an method error and not ambivalence, but looking through the other 2 tests, its ISTJ. I am going to work with ISTJ even if I am aware that in the other days there was a X and a P instead of a J.
Fi vs Fe
Preference for Fi over Fe, stable and clear. Expected for ISTJ in cognitive function stack (Grant Cognitive Function Stack, GCFS or shortly GFS).
Si vs Se
Preference for Si over Se, stable and clear. Expected for ISTJ in GFS and in my alternative method.
Ne vs Ni
Preference for Ni over Ne, clearly. The opposite was expected for ISTJ in both GFS and in my alternative method.
Te vs Ti
Preference for Te over Ti, but in the other 2 texts there was no preference. Actually, this is why there is an J in this last result. Expected for ISTJ in GFS.
Final saying: Well, better than the last time I typed you as XXXX throught test and looking at the functions, its now ISTJ (ISTX taking in account the timeline, your P and J seems to oscilate), with some INFP traits, although I question myself how stable are these traits. Ill create two hybrid text descriptions, one for this analysis and a shorter second one that tends to describe what is stable in longer term.
A: "In particular, they remember their impressions of experiences they’ve had. They have an organized internal world and their mind can easily put similar pieces of information into appropriate categories. They learn straightforward, practical systems, rules, and strategies with ease and grace and love when something is done right. Loves efficiency and getting things done, and can enjoy a bit of healthy competition at times if they feel like they have a chance at winning. They tend to rely on what makes the most sense logically. They are more concerned about moving forward than they are about it being the perfect solution. They use their intuition to find patterns, underlying principles, and ideas, and to form connections as they talk, write, or create. Flourishes when given new, interesting concepts to consider and consistently seeks out new inspiration from the outside world.Can easily get drained if they have to actively engage with the people or the world around them for long periods of time. Often start out life being less aware of and equipped to deal with feelings."
B: "In particular, they remember their impressions of experiences they’ve had. They have an organized internal world and their mind can easily put similar pieces of information into appropriate categories. They learn straightforward, practical systems, rules, and strategies with ease and grace and love when something is done right. Loves efficiency and getting things done. They tend to rely on what makes the most sense logically. Makes decisions based on logical analysis done over time in their head. Often start out life being less aware of and equipped to deal with feelings"