Keirsey talked about how in each of the four temperaments there's a directive role and an informative one. This is probably one of the better ideas in personality theory, as this idea can be expanded on not just on a level within the temperament, but I think the temperaments themselves have high or low levels of direction and information inherent in them. From directive to informative, it's probably something like:
1. Guardian
2. Rational
3. Idealist
4. Artisan
How the roles fall in seems to follow a pattern almost:
1. Administrator (STJ)
2. Coordinator (NTJ)
3. Mentor (NFJ)
4. Conservator (SFJ)
5. Operator (STP)
6. Engineer (NTP)
7. Advocate (NFP)
8. Entertainer (SFP)
In a way, they correlate with their "establishment view". 1 and 2 (TJs) "actively support" the establishment, 3 and 4 (FJs) "work for" (semiactive support) the establishment, 5 and 6 (TPs) "participate in" (passive support) the establishment, and 7 and 8 (FPs) "oppose" the establishment.
1. Guardian
2. Rational
3. Idealist
4. Artisan
How the roles fall in seems to follow a pattern almost:
1. Administrator (STJ)
2. Coordinator (NTJ)
3. Mentor (NFJ)
4. Conservator (SFJ)
5. Operator (STP)
6. Engineer (NTP)
7. Advocate (NFP)
8. Entertainer (SFP)
In a way, they correlate with their "establishment view". 1 and 2 (TJs) "actively support" the establishment, 3 and 4 (FJs) "work for" (semiactive support) the establishment, 5 and 6 (TPs) "participate in" (passive support) the establishment, and 7 and 8 (FPs) "oppose" the establishment.