Nocapszy
no clinkz 'til brooklyn
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2007
- Messages
- 4,517
- MBTI Type
- ENTP
What the fuck is going on here guys?
The recent flood of type related threads truly are an embarrassment. Starting with the retaliatory Why do thinkers hate F??????? to Bluewing's (who, by the way is not wrong) recent 'attacks': threads such as TLL's and this gem ending with all those wonderous "which type is most ____"
Cut it out.
Oh and those obsequious, pandering N vs. S threads...
Lemme clue you guys in on something. Being intuitive is a fair indicator of elevated intelligence. It's not even a debate.
There ARE dumb intuitives though, and there ARE smart sensors.
Ask grayscale. One of the more intelligent posters on the board passing up a good number of the intuitives. He's an S. I always commend him in situations like these. The hero of the Ss? Perhaps, but he's not alone.
It's possible to be smart, and be a sensor.
How about a brain teaser. Could being intuitive possibly be the result of rather than a cause of intelligence?
That is to ask, is it likely, or probable if, contingent on intelligence, you'll develop intuitive functions, rather than sensate functions?
Call me a terrorist if you will. You won't be the first. The truth is terrifying, I agree with you.
This doesn't change the fact that you're taking it too personally, if you're a sensor.
Let me post this question to you:
Which matters more?
A) being intelligent
B) being intuitive, and presumed intelligent
Choose in the poll.
If answer A has the higher number of votes, I'll know we're a pack of liars who's rhetoric conflicts their action.
You're all asking the wrong questions. It's no wonder Victor hates typology.
Well... I do too.
Point being, let's stop with the trolling and superficiality.
Chisel the stones, after you excavate them.
A sculpture is no good if it's stuck in the ground. Imagine if da Vinci left his art in the earth.
The recent flood of type related threads truly are an embarrassment. Starting with the retaliatory Why do thinkers hate F??????? to Bluewing's (who, by the way is not wrong) recent 'attacks': threads such as TLL's and this gem ending with all those wonderous "which type is most ____"
Cut it out.
Oh and those obsequious, pandering N vs. S threads...
Lemme clue you guys in on something. Being intuitive is a fair indicator of elevated intelligence. It's not even a debate.
There ARE dumb intuitives though, and there ARE smart sensors.
Ask grayscale. One of the more intelligent posters on the board passing up a good number of the intuitives. He's an S. I always commend him in situations like these. The hero of the Ss? Perhaps, but he's not alone.
It's possible to be smart, and be a sensor.
How about a brain teaser. Could being intuitive possibly be the result of rather than a cause of intelligence?
That is to ask, is it likely, or probable if, contingent on intelligence, you'll develop intuitive functions, rather than sensate functions?
Call me a terrorist if you will. You won't be the first. The truth is terrifying, I agree with you.
This doesn't change the fact that you're taking it too personally, if you're a sensor.
Let me post this question to you:
Which matters more?
A) being intelligent
B) being intuitive, and presumed intelligent
Choose in the poll.
If answer A has the higher number of votes, I'll know we're a pack of liars who's rhetoric conflicts their action.
You're all asking the wrong questions. It's no wonder Victor hates typology.
Well... I do too.
Point being, let's stop with the trolling and superficiality.
Chisel the stones, after you excavate them.
A sculpture is no good if it's stuck in the ground. Imagine if da Vinci left his art in the earth.