BAM!
ENFP and ISTJ are supposed to be opposites.
BAM!
Is that true?
Have to build the program on a good model.I've always wondered why robots act like ISTJs
Unlike the Ni user who is convinced they can see the core of reality, the Si user knows the core is forever beyond perception.
High Ni users do not usually believe that, I don't think. In fact, Ni is based on everything being merely subjective perspectives and vantage points, stripping concepts of objective meaning. As such, and as Pi, they will also usually understand that seeking pure objectivity is futile.
An extroverted function is more likely to be convinced of that as they are ¨objective¨.
Regarding the bolded, people seem to think that Ni does this with intent, or some sort of understanding between the conscious and unconscious. It doesn't. It is ingrained in its nature to habitually develop and nurture these subjective vantage points.
Is the extroverted function's desire also not to be objective, though? How are we to question the perceptions of those rarely expressive when they rarely express their perceptions?
Indeed, it is Te with the highest propensity for the characteristic ascribed, and Te gets paired theoretically with Si and Ni. The function with the highest propensity for rationalization of actuality is Se. Ergo, leading Te/Ni can be the most 'dogmatic' of the possible functional combinations, bringing several of my contentions full circle.
So…
Neatfreaks?